Details about the new pve-no-subscripton repository

Discussion in 'Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration' started by martin, Aug 22, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mo_

    mo_ Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    3
    I have been silently following the discussions about the policy change and have to agree that the announcement could have been handled better, but thats basically the only complaint I got. While I personally dont like additional Popups you have to close before getting to any usable UI, I can accept this rather drastic measure as a means to try to ensure the longevity of this software project.

    I do have one question tho and a ... proposal?

    Question: there will still be the pve-test repository in its current form, correct?

    Because in that case, I would think these new/rebranded 3 repositories can actually be pretty accurately described by comparison - and this comparison would be Debian.

    pve-test corresponds to Debians unstable branch (bleeding edge branch of debian)
    pve-no-subscription corresponds to Debians testing branch (this is what can be considered a very stable and production ready branch)
    pve-enterprise corresponds to Debians stable branch (this is a special branch that features outdated but heavily tested versions, intended for installations where a 100% stable system is absolutely paramount - like super critical infrastructure).

    Does that seem fitting? Because I feel like this could explain the new repositories reasonably well to people that know Debian at least.
     
  2. e100

    e100 Active Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    24
    Sorry I confused you with the other nopenopenope user who said this:

    That explains everything
     
  3. e100

    e100 Active Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    24
    A couple of days ago I was using the pve repo that is now known as the non enterprise repo.
    Oh the horror! I was not running the stable enterprise repo for the last few years. This whole time I have been using unstable software and my systems might have crashed!
    I am so glad they created this new enterprise repo. Without it I would be stuck using the same unstable repo that we were all forced to use for the last few years.
    Can you believe that? All these years and proxmox never had a stable repo!
    Anyone who does not switch to the enterprise repo is going to risk having the seven plagues spew from their Ethernet ports. Using the same repo tomorrow that you used last week is the most unacceptable option ever!

    /sarcasm

    Did you ever stop to think that the wording of things might be designed to encourage people to purchase a subscription?
    Or that such wording might help satisfy the pointy haired boss to justify approval for purchasing a subscription?

    No one was concerned about using the non-enterprise repo last week, I see no reason anyone should be concerned to use it next week.

    But if someone wants, as they say in MIB, the best of the best of the best then they should purchase a subscription like I did.

    But if the best is good enough and you can't/won't pay for a subscription then use the non-enterprise repo like we have all been doing for the last few years.
     
  4. dietmar

    dietmar Proxmox Staff Member
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    16,461
    Likes Received:
    311
    Yes, that calculation is correct.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. dietmar

    dietmar Proxmox Staff Member
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    16,461
    Likes Received:
    311
    Yes.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. udo

    udo Well-Known Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2009
    Messages:
    5,835
    Likes Received:
    159
    Hi,
    but this is only 100% right if there was also an pve-no-subscription-test instead of the old pve-test.

    And if I understand right the pve-test is gone and therefore it's more that pve-no-subscription is the old pve-test, or I am wrong?

    Udo
     
  7. udo

    udo Well-Known Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2009
    Messages:
    5,835
    Likes Received:
    159
    Hi,
    the wiki is open for each user - so why there are not a better documentation, or up-to-date video tutorials? Where is the big community (also you) if you miss there something?

    Udo (and I wrote an wiki-post allready ;-) - ok, perhaps not very up-to-date )
     
  8. Raymond Burns

    Raymond Burns Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    1
    How do you get an account for the wiki?
    I'll write up some stuff.
    Might as well try to contribute as best I can!
     
  9. dietmar

    dietmar Proxmox Staff Member
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    16,461
    Likes Received:
    311
    The pvetest repository was my personal playground. I create/delete that on demand, but it is no official repository (and was never intended to be one).
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. dietmar

    dietmar Proxmox Staff Member
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    16,461
    Likes Received:
    311
    Try to login - then you will find a link to the account request page.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. nopenopenope

    nopenopenope New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2013
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't like your attitude. I can imagine that you've worked on the project for the last 5 years and had to help a lot of people who didn't pay a single dime, I've seen a bunch of threads on the forum. However, I don't agree with how you added the nag screen and I certainly didn't like the way you've replied at all. I haven't been around for the last 5 years to be one of those persons with tens or hundreds of servers who doesn't pay you and who doesn't donate.

    Either way, I'm done with Proxmox VE and with this community. I wish you good luck.
     
  12. nopenopenope

    nopenopenope New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2013
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think you have a problem and you're not even worth replying to any more. Perhaps you can get professional help.
     
  13. dietmar

    dietmar Proxmox Staff Member
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    16,461
    Likes Received:
    311
    Thanks :)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. ebiss

    ebiss Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    You good luck too...
     
  15. ozgurerdogan

    ozgurerdogan Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    First sorry for making this threat longer. I think nag screen is not just a annoying nag screen. It is a popup that reminds me that I am a free user after using it for years. That makes me feel bad :). It could be at least randomly poping up or making a one time donation would also make is disabled to show users how kind you are. And best of course being able to disabled it. But of course it is your decision so I have respect for it...
    As long as non-enterprise is stable which you explained so, I am still happy with proxmox and still my first opinion of course.
     
  16. jdw

    jdw Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    1
    On the nag screen, I mentioned this to a colleague today. His response:

    "Still faster than logging in to (expletive deleted) VMware."

    :D
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. RRJ

    RRJ Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    0
    people, stop speaking /whining of that nag screen. If you don't like it - remove it by your own hands. Its just 5-sec job to do, if you know what you are doing. Proxmox team has rights to remind users to get subscription to use more stable production version of their software.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  18. RobFantini

    RobFantini Active Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,520
    Likes Received:
    21
    Hello Martin.

    I think that is a great idea. Proxmox works well and forum support is all I really need. But we are a company that counts on Proxmox like Pfsense, Freepbx/astersk and other systems to just work. Here I can keep things running, but that means no real vacations. It is in our companies best interest for Proxmox to be around and support available.. We do prepay for hourly support from Pfsense and Freepbx. Our office manager and her assistant can with freepbz support handle any phone system issue. Our business needs the same type of set up for Proxmox systems.

    As soon as our two new systems arrive, we'll purchase a subscription.
     
  19. pfoo

    pfoo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's quite easy to remove (but It will be re-added at each update), but I don't like the principle behind it.
    So, you are using proxmox without subscribtion, it is your right to do so, but you are constantly (ok, at each login, but for all users) reminded that you do not own a valid licence and you must consider buing one .. It is reminding me of those anti-piracy ads that you sometime have to watch before seeing a movie at the movie theather or on a blueray that you legally own ...

    It's not a big deal, but it is annoying.
     
  20. PigLover

    PigLover Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    33
    Dietmar,

    Lets make a little deal. Proxmox VE is built on the shoulders of so much free open source software that YOU did not contribute to and that YOU did not write - and Proxmox VE could not exist without Debian, KVM, the Linux kernel, etc, etc, etc...

    When you show us the $ you've chosen to send over to all those developers we'll stop griping about your very anti-social nag screen approach. While you may not have broken the letter of the GPL you've definitely left the spirt of that license in tatters.

    oh - btw, when you calculate how much money you owe to those whose software you are using for free - make sure you pay them a linear multiplier for every CPU you've every licensed Proxmox to run on...

    alternatively, please just remove the nag screen and stop ranting about users who do not chose to contribute. That's how FOSS works...some people see value in what you've built and will gladly contribute. Others are mere 'users' who contribute nothing. Show value, satisfy your users and you'll have no problem selling support subscriptions. Keep up the 'attitude' on the forums and your supporters will become your detractors. And FOSS company's who build up a lot of detractors tend to die off...
     
    #100 PigLover, Aug 24, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice