Hello,
I'm using Proxmox Mail Gateway in front of an internal mail server (WHM/cPanel) to manage email sending and receiving.
Everything works fine for inbound mail. The problem is when sending outbound emails from my internal server to any...
Oh pardon, ich hatte fas mit dem falschen in Verbindung gebracht. Danke für den Hinweis, dann ignoriere ich Deine Ausführungen und bitte um das gleiche der meinen. Damit wende ich meine Aufmerksamkeit der relevanten Antworten.
1. bin ich ein Forum-Mitglied und kein Proxmox Support oder Staff.
2. Die Patchinfo ist von September - wir haben November - möglich das wir mit den Updates schon weiter sind.
3. Wenn du Probleme bei Hetzner hast und davon überzeugt bist, das es...
To update my own post, after waiting for backup to finish, I tried with with gro-hw off only and that seems to be enough for a fix the issue. Hopefully this narrows it down, if Proxmox decides to report the issue somewhere upstream.
Hello folks.
I've been looking at some of my zfs disk builds. Trying to optimize for speed.
This is an array of 8 identical spinners on a Gen13 Delll poweredge.
zpool iostat -v
capacity operations...
I"ve seen PVE site-to-site sync done with pvezsync.
Boy, that's complicated. I can't imagine setting that up at scale. You'd have to pretty much write your own app to manage it all.
This is possible with pve-zsync, it's actually intended for "advanced backup strategies":
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/PVE-zsync
You would still need to launch the guests but RPO should still be faster than restoring from the backup. Obviouvsly...
I've just done some testing with a very rudimentary websockets client, I am apparently able to connect using that so it would seem that at least the socket is opening and accepting connections (contrary to what noVNC suggests), however I've still...
Hi @Antics04 - Forgive my ignorance, but where are you running these commands from? Are you running then from the recovery mode option?
When I try to run the recovery option from the Proxmox 9 ISO, I do get the /boot warning, but, then it says...
Hello!, is there any specific configuration on PVE to allow s VM to pass multiple MACs to a given port?.
usecase would be having PVE over PVE with nested config, including networking (bridges and tagging).
The ChangeLog of QEMU 10.1 states
Following this a relevant gain in speed is possible (for disk migrations).
Is the suggested bigger buffer part of the update or do I have to set in manually?