Building ProxMox on Devuan

[rhY]

Hey all! Long time ProxMox fan, have used it to great success in many scenarios.

I'm very interested in migrating all of my backend servers and services to Devuan as it is far more stable and easy to manage than Debian. I know I'm going off the reservation here, but is it possible to build ProxMox (even an older version) on Devuan? Would I just follow the Wheezy instructions? Which version would I be eventually be installing? Are there still security updates to the older versions?

Thanks in advance,
Rhy

 

[danielb]

I dont think that's possible as proxmox uses several systemd features

 

[rhY]

I dont think that's possible as proxmox uses several systemd features

Current version, obviously. What about the old version that worked on Wheezy? I'm legitimately considering forking ProxMox to have a Devuan base. Not just for myself, but for the good of humanity.

 

[dietmar]

Using old software is almost always a bad idea! Besides, I think that Debian is much more stable than Devuan and easier to handle (thanks to systemd).

 

[rhY]

You have not done much side by side comparison between Devuan and Debian, clearly.

The stability is so much greater in Devuan it's not even funny. Not to mention efficiency, easier to manage code, faster boot times, cron support, and several other industry standard solutions that are totally broken from Debian 8 forward. I strongly suggest you run some tests of your own between Devuan and Debian and see for yourself. You can't argue with the 5-10% CPU gains, 15-20% memory gains, and several seconds of boot time speed that Devuan has over Debian at this point.

Debian has gotten more and more bloated, as you'd expect using giant, poorly-understood monolithic corporate garbage such as systemD. Run the tests. Load a giant mail server on Debian, and then Devuan, and run some scripts that abuse the heck out of it. Debian will die way sooner than Devuan.

On most of the servers I manage i was staying with Debian 7 as long as possible, and only much later started migrating them to Devuan. So far I've had near 100% success rate, which I certainly did not on any of the services and containers I was trying on Debian 8. I haven't even bothered with Debian 9 or 10, because the Debian 8 experience was so pathetic. Maybe it's gotten better?

At any rate, you should definitely look at Devuan very closely. Your statements above were not only false, but almost exactly the opposite of reality. I would love to see the evidence for what you said, if you have any.

 

[dietmar]

At any rate, you should definitely look at Devuan very closely. Your statements above were not only false, but almost exactly the opposite of reality. I would love to see the evidence for what you said, if you have any.

Seems you really believe that. But as said above, we need many features from systemd, so Devuan is no option.

 

[tom]

You have not done much side by side comparison between Devuan and Debian, clearly.

You talked about building an old Proxmox Wheezy version on Devuan - this is old software with known bugs and you will put users to risk. This is a really bad idea. Current Proxmox version heavily depends on systemd, so you cannot build this with Devuan.

I do not want a basic discussion about Devuan here, this is the Proxmox VE support forum only.

 

[rhY]

OK, well I'll give it a go and see how ProxMox 3 runs on it. Thanks for the civil conversation. It's appreciated. Is there a list of known vulnerabilities for ProxMox 3 so I can patch them, or fix them myself?

 

[csillag]

Hi, I wonder if there is any progress around this? (Last post for 4.5 years ago.)

I'm also interested in running ProxMox on a Devuan server. (No chance for moving back to Debian.)

Up to now I have been running VirtualBox, but I am considering migrating to ProxMox because of stability issues.

So, is ProxMox still closely tied to systemd services?

 

[esi_y]

Hi, I wonder if there is any progress around this? (Last post for 4.5 years ago.)

Well, they made their preferences clear back then. Systemd got only more mainstream since.

I'm also interested in running ProxMox on a Devuan server. (No chance for moving back to Debian.)

Up to now I have been running VirtualBox, but I am considering migrating to ProxMox because of stability issues.

If you are looking to replace VB, why not start with virt-manager / libvirt instead?

So, is ProxMox still closely tied to systemd services?

If you do not like systemd, you will hate PVE in terms of monolithic complexity.

(NB I do run some systems without systemd, but they are special use cases - so I am not in either camp.)

 

[esi_y]

Current Proxmox version heavily depends on systems

What systemd only features does it actually use, out of curiosity? This was someone asking long about about building it on Wheezy, but I do not see any features that a regular init cannot handle if done right (it's usually easier going backwards). Note I am not asking you to do it, but is it just "too much work and we/Debian had picked a horse already" or do I miss something that only systemd can provide?

 

[rhY]

What systemd only features does it actually use, out of curiosity? This was someone asking long about about building it on Wheezy, but I do not see any features that a regular init cannot handle if done right (it's usually easier going backwards). Note I am not asking you to do it, but is it just "too much work and we/Debian had picked a horse already" or do I miss something that only systemd can provide?

Yes I'm also curious about this. At some point I want to fork ProxMox and do something really radical with it:

https://supermox.weebly.com/

 

[LnxBil]

Yes I'm also curious about this. At some point I want to fork ProxMox and do something really radical with it:

https://supermox.weebly.com/

What a wet dream ... and totally unarchievable on so many levels. I wish you succeed, yet I cannot imagine it.

 

[esi_y]

I just suspect a publicity stunt.

But I wonder why a hypervisor needs anything "tightly coupled" with any sort of init.

That said, when it already jumped over to the ESP travesty for EFI install, why it is not going UKIs and making an exception for SecureBoot.