Hello
I am using ProxMox as an VE for all my purposes as an CIO in the University I work.
I have a ProxMox Cluster of 3 nodes where I want to make one VM high-available between two of the nodes, using the third one for quorum reasons only. I have DRBD setup and working properly. Also no problems with the cluster itself.
In my scenario I need to use PCI 10GB Intel LAN cards for creating an advanced router OS. I am using this LAN cards via PCI Passtrough due to many reasons. I want to make that router High-Availabe because its a critical system. I have two problems:
1. When I have hostpci in my VM conf file the HA checkbox is unavailable.
2. When I migrate the machine from one node to another the hostpci rows in my config file disappear.
I am aware that my scenario is an isolated case of practical realisation, but I would appreciate a workaround to enable HA on this case and keep my config file unchanged during migration process. I am ok if the solution includes creating a custom patch.
Please give me some guidance how to solve my issue. Any hints will be highly rated
Regards
Eng. S. Gluhov
IT Manager (CIO)
Plovdiv University
I am using ProxMox as an VE for all my purposes as an CIO in the University I work.
I have a ProxMox Cluster of 3 nodes where I want to make one VM high-available between two of the nodes, using the third one for quorum reasons only. I have DRBD setup and working properly. Also no problems with the cluster itself.
In my scenario I need to use PCI 10GB Intel LAN cards for creating an advanced router OS. I am using this LAN cards via PCI Passtrough due to many reasons. I want to make that router High-Availabe because its a critical system. I have two problems:
1. When I have hostpci in my VM conf file the HA checkbox is unavailable.
2. When I migrate the machine from one node to another the hostpci rows in my config file disappear.
I am aware that my scenario is an isolated case of practical realisation, but I would appreciate a workaround to enable HA on this case and keep my config file unchanged during migration process. I am ok if the solution includes creating a custom patch.
Please give me some guidance how to solve my issue. Any hints will be highly rated
Regards
Eng. S. Gluhov
IT Manager (CIO)
Plovdiv University