Survey: Do you use KVM or OpenVZ, or both?

Discussion in 'Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration' started by martin, Sep 17, 2012.

?

Do you use KVM, OpenVZ, or both?

  1. KVM

    181 vote(s)
    40.0%
  2. OpenVZ

    51 vote(s)
    11.3%
  3. Both

    221 vote(s)
    48.8%
  1. axion.joey

    axion.joey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    1
    About 100 containers. Only use KVM for vyatta firewall
     
  2. OO-Dragon

    OO-Dragon New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    KVM Mostly and OpenVZ when I can.
     
  3. funkblastin

    funkblastin New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    OpenVZ for mostly everything (since I have very limited CPU, RAM resources), KVM for a few (Windows XP machine, Windows 7 Box, and a MacOSx box.)
     
  4. Gilles

    Gilles New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    I use both as many people here : openVZ wherever possible (performance) and KVM when no other choice. My question is what is the future of OpenVZ vs LXC in a few months (years ?)
     
  5. tarax

    tarax Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm happily using KVM only and hope OpenVZ will someday be replaced by LXC and bring us all the goodness of recent kernels...
    Keep on the good work, and thank you very much for all !
     
  6. t-m

    t-m New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Both of them.

    Do you have any information about the future ?
    I hope openvz will be maintained even if Debian has announced no longer support it in the main branch.
     
  7. ehabh

    ehabh New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most of My VMs are linux under openvz and only one for a windows desktop.
     
  8. superbit

    superbit New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2012
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
  9. dominix

    dominix New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2012
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have near 20 server running proxmox,
    most (15) use only local storage + KVM
    some (5) in cluster are using OVZ+KVM on local+NFS
     
  10. RaNa

    RaNa Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2011
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey guys how about a survey for software raid support im sure im not the only one who would like to see that. and thank you so much for proxmox i love it
     
  11. Molch

    Molch Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    KVM only.
     
  12. arnolem

    arnolem New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    2
    OpenVZ only
     
  13. bodhi.zazen

    bodhi.zazen New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have used openvz for several years and use it almost exclusivly. The only reason I use KVM is if I feel I need selinux or apparmor in the guest.
     
  14. dt47

    dt47 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    I couldn't find any documentation, how to implement HA for OpenVZ with a SAN. Can you provide a link or some more information?
    Doesnt Live-Migration mean no downtime ideally?
    Atm I use both, though KVM is the only choice for HA here, atleast I was not able to setup everything up, so I could use OpenVZ for HA (atleast not without using some clusterfs).
     
    #74 dt47, Jan 28, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
  15. tom

    tom Proxmox Staff Member
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    13,635
    Likes Received:
    419
    AW: Survey: Do you use KVM or OpenVZ, or both?

    To get HA with openvz, you need NFS.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  16. RobFantini

    RobFantini Well-Known Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    26
    for a while I had decided to use only KVM. that for high availability.

    by the time I got to converting our 2 ldap dual master vz's i realized they already had a highly available setup. Openvz is simplier to manage for us then using a shared file system and kvm.

    we'll do the same for dhcp and dns - run the service using a ct on 2 or more pve systems probably using centos on one and debian on the other. that way if one or the other has an update that breaks the container then the other has a better chance of still running.
     
  17. drott

    drott Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    At this time use CT only.

    Openvz had an awful lot to offer, my first introduction to openvz was my consultant doing provisioning work for new and wanting to show me that devian and openvz was really a viable option to either esx and or vmware server or Red Hat. His demo was we were running a live IRC support session between the US and Australia and we moved from one server to the other and we did not notice anything and he did with out telling me. Not until he told me that it swiched and check the new HN for the IRC session did I notice that that anything had changed. That was impressive and that sold me. I did not have to purchase an expensive esx license or REHL and we were moving between 32 and 64 bit machines.

    I like the way CT's work and once I learned the cli for the HN with the VZ commands you sure can do a lot. You can stack a lot more CT's on a HN than you can stack KVMS. There is always the concern of a runaway CT but Proxmox webui makes that a non issue or some odd ball kernel issue with the number of running processes. I wish that it were a bit more intuitive way with PS to see what container was running what processes.

    I do like the way one can create a new server in a matter of minutes. Having a just over a hundred vms under exsi, I really like CTS as long as the HN is working because more than once I have moved files btw running CT by working from the HN. Great way to move SSH keys. I like root access to CT via the vzctl. That works really slick and if you forgot password to root, its a lifesaver.

    The fact that proxmox is offering both kvm and CT's gives one the best of both worlds. Hats off to the team. Thanks
     
  18. RobFantini

    RobFantini Well-Known Member
    Proxmox Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    26
    Re: AW: Survey: Do you use KVM or OpenVZ, or both?

    Tom - for high availability at the service level, like dhcp, dns or ldap , then two containers for each service running on local storage at two different hosts is better for us.

    High Availability is built into isc-dhcp-server , ldap , dns and probably other services.
     
  19. Mitya

    Mitya Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: AW: Survey: Do you use KVM or OpenVZ, or both?

    In 1.x used both, now slowly migrating to kvm-only. It would be great to have igb|ixgbe vf management in web. Now using console for this purpose (script to configure Vfs on server start and manually writing them to vm configs). Today got idea to see if I can add it to pve-manager...
     
  20. sebastien

    sebastien New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mostly KVM. I use some OpenVZ CT when I need ether a testing machine or a light dedicated appliance. I guess I'd use KVM for that too if OpenVZ weren't available. Since OpenVZ is here, I tend to use it from time to time.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice