https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases ZFS 0.8.4 released 2 hours ago, so no, to late to be included directly into this release.
We'll release it as package update soon if testing shows no issues.
Do you mind to move this package to pvetest repo?
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases ZFS 0.8.4 released 2 hours ago, so no, to late to be included directly into this release.
We'll release it as package update soon if testing shows no issues.
Do you mind to move this package to pvetest repo?
I seem to have a problem opening novnc and xterm.js windows with Firefox following PVE 6.2 update, anyone else able to confirm this is a problem?
Not really. The backup is around 40% slower on the local array, but i'm not concerned about that at all, as it's still fine and quick enough. I was bottlenecking when doing the offsite backup and the bandwidth was already pushing the times higher than what's needed for the better compression. On the other hand, the reduction of size should end up in considerable gains in backup times. And that's beside the cost of the storage itself. Moreover, it's great having a choice. I can set lzo for the local array and still have speed, while using zstd for remote ones and gaining time and space. One of those improvements that's unarguably awesome all aroundthat's great! has the backup and restore time improved as well?
Not really. The backup is around 40% slower on the local array, but i'm not concerned about that at all, as it's still fine and quick enough. I was bottlenecking when doing the offsite backup and the bandwidth was already pushing the times higher than what's needed for the better compression. On the other hand, the reduction of size should end up in considerable gains in backup times. And that's beside the cost of the storage itself. Moreover, it's great having a choice. I can set lzo for the local array and still have speed, while using zstd for remote ones and gaining time and space. One of those improvements that's unarguably awesome all around
So quick question still the backups are full? not incremental?
that's exciting. thanks for the heads up. are we talking months or years? sorry just being nosy.Yes. vzdump backup archives will stay that way, a solution for incremental de-duplicated is under development though.
Incremental backups would kind of defeat the concept of data redundancy, since a bit rot of one of the data clusters would nullify the whole set of incrementals. For incrementals there are the snapshots.So quick question still the backups are full? not incremental?
Just set up ACME using DNS and it's easy mode!
Looking forward to not having to copy my wildcard certs to each proxmox node when the old ones expired.
Do you mind to move this package to pvetest repo?
You have some service daemons not running and/or issues to connect to the API.Hello there,
After making the last update in the system, the information is not displayed on the CTs. CTs are open but do not provide graphical or statistical information. One of them seems closed but has access. Why can this be the problem?
https://prnt.sc/shzesv
https://prnt.sc/shzf07
systemctl restart pvestatd pveproxy pvedaemon
ZFS 0.8.4 now in the pve-no-subscription repo. Does it contain same patches as in pvetest version? Specially - patches from arenas to speedup zvol.ZFS 0.8.4 is now available in our pvetest repo.
Does it contain same patches as in pvetest version?
Specially - patches from arenas to speedup zvol.
I will try to test pvetest version with fio and report here.Yes, exact same packages as they where on pvetest.
No, as testing from us and also external users ( https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2666#c6 ) showed no noticeable improvement. We include the exact upstream release plus a few packaging related adaptions/fixes.
I will try to test pvetest version with fio and report here.