A previous post was taken down for mentioning a competitor so I won't mention them here and sorry if this is the wrong place for a feature request but there doesn't seem to be a place in the forums to ask.
In this other hypervisor, storage was done locally on the nodes (as opposed to a central backend) and data was duplicated node to node much like RAID5 across the network. This enables high availability, live migration and adding new nodes scales computing and storage in the cluster at the same time.
The other nice feature is each VM is allocated storage space but the hypervisor decides if the data is placed on ssd or platter. They maintain frequently accessed data on ssd's and move older data to platter (or back again if accessed frequently) all automatically; much like a hybrid drive I suppose.
I would like to see storage features like this in ProxMox or at least witness a debate on the pros and cons of the approach.
Kev
In this other hypervisor, storage was done locally on the nodes (as opposed to a central backend) and data was duplicated node to node much like RAID5 across the network. This enables high availability, live migration and adding new nodes scales computing and storage in the cluster at the same time.
The other nice feature is each VM is allocated storage space but the hypervisor decides if the data is placed on ssd or platter. They maintain frequently accessed data on ssd's and move older data to platter (or back again if accessed frequently) all automatically; much like a hybrid drive I suppose.
I would like to see storage features like this in ProxMox or at least witness a debate on the pros and cons of the approach.
Kev