Hello,
I have been running a 4 node cluster for a few years now. I have changed my storage options a few times. the last change I made was from ceph rbd to local zfs raid 1. This means that I can't use the HA features of proxmox 9.2 effectively. This begs the question why don't you stay with ceph. I have borked ceph twice now. I am not skilled enough to reliably admin this kind of technology. I don't have the budget for the recommended hardware and paid consultants to make it work.
Local storage can and does work. However, I want to get the communities opinion on using nfs 4.2 as a shared storage device for my vms. This seems like it would be a good compromise for complexity and opening HA in proxmox. Looking for the good, the bad and the ugly of this path.
Thanks.
I have been running a 4 node cluster for a few years now. I have changed my storage options a few times. the last change I made was from ceph rbd to local zfs raid 1. This means that I can't use the HA features of proxmox 9.2 effectively. This begs the question why don't you stay with ceph. I have borked ceph twice now. I am not skilled enough to reliably admin this kind of technology. I don't have the budget for the recommended hardware and paid consultants to make it work.
Local storage can and does work. However, I want to get the communities opinion on using nfs 4.2 as a shared storage device for my vms. This seems like it would be a good compromise for complexity and opening HA in proxmox. Looking for the good, the bad and the ugly of this path.
Thanks.