Search results

Hello people, today I received a return of referring to CPU intel, they still did not provide the label processor. Thank you all for your help.

There is some intel software that I can analyze the product and True?

I update the bios to identify the processor. I am now in the latest version 2.0.

Hello everyone and thank you for your attention. I am sending photos of the product, the processor was purchased directly with the Intel representatives and it is claimed the processor is not the ES tests.

root@0:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 79 model name : Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 @ 2.20GHz stepping : 1 microcode : 0xb000010 cpu MHz : 1683.257 cache size : 25600 KB physical id : 0...

Hello everyone, I bought a brand CPU Intel Xeon E5 2698 V4 put the Proxmox did not recognize the CPU in the description of / etc / cpuinfo featuring Genuine Intel (R) CPU 0000 @ 2.2GHz. Proxmox -ve: 4.2-56 (running kernel: 4.4.13-1-pve) pve-manager: 4.2-15 (running version: 4.2-15 / 6669ad2c)...

Hello people, I know that when directly use the VM disk on the physical hardware (/dev/mapper/vm-id-disk.raw) improved performance, but the Proxmox could leave the default management via lvm in / var / lib / vz and have options to move the disk in thin format. At this point I have a partition /...

I know it's not possible to create a VM with the same ID, however I realized the next test. - My Proxmox is not with any VM installed. - Initiate the restore of the VM ID 100 - During the restore process (10%) - I created a new VM with ID 100 - After the end of the restore fails because there...

Hello , sorry for the delay. The version in which the tests performed are listed below.

Hello everyone , I will be posting two improvements to the Proxmox developers. First : When you canceled a backup running a VM status VM is as " locked " being necessary to enter via shell and run the command qm unlock VM_ID . Second : During restore a VM for the proxmoxo interface ID allows me...

Hello people , my server has two network cards eth0 and eth1 , eth0 on the board this my LAN 192 ... which presented the vmbr0 . The network card eth1 this my LAN BKP 172 ... which presented the vmbr1 . My LXC is working with vmbr0 However does not accept the vmbr1 settings . What can I do ? my...

Hello everyone, this week I am testing the pve 4.2 this very good especially with LXC . I have a doubt that I believe is not yet implemented it would be like to move the location of LXC disk for storage.

Thanks for the answer. You know let me know if there are some good practices that addresses the best processor for use Proxmox and standard applications? Comments. I performed some tests with OpenSuse13 with installed XEN and realized that SuSE has a specific kernel for its functionality and...

Hello Guys, I'm doing some tests of performance between KVM64 default and host processors ( physical processor) , however I realized that with linux machines the KVM64 has higher performance , but with Windows machines host this with better performance. It would be possible someone from Proxmox...

Hello Guys, hesitate any plans or interest in implementing the administration of disks for storage ISCSI VM 'S LXC the GUI ?

Yes, today my VM's are with his records in iSCSI storage . I not found in Proxmox interface to migrate the LXC container disk to the iSCSI storage location on the server only .

hello I am testing the new version of Proxmox 4.1 with LXC container, but have not found the GUI to migrate the VM Disk (LXC) for my iSCSI storage. Could help me? thank you

Always waiting for new Proxmox update forever.

Thank Dietmar. Follow lspci | grep Ethernet 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20) 01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation...

Hello wolfgand, Tonight I performed the test with pve kernel 4.2.3.22, realized the server reboot and started the VM. Ping in good stable network and VM operating properly. Today in the morning the users started working and I noticed that up to about 20 users connected the server was stable...