Latest activity
-
fiona replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.Hi, with QEMU 10.2, there was a switch to using io_uring for the IO thread event loops and the IO pressure/wait accounting is set via the io_uring subsystem now. It's a different kernel subsystem from before, so it's not unexpected if it's... -
Glike I said - this is a global problem the last few months (well, a bit longer now already I guess). anything with dynamic content that basically allows endless possibilities to query (like git forges, forums, ...) are hit particularly hard...
-
Glike many other sites and pieces of public infrastructure, ours is getting hammered by AI scrapers/bots as well. we try our best to implement counter measures, but it's a constant game of whack-a-mole.
-
Ggfngfn256 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.Sure. You can do anything on PVE without any subscription. You just can't get access to the subscription repo, which is a curated repo of the latest (already) available releases from the no-subscription & test repos.
-
Vvaschthestampede replied to the thread Unexpected backup failures.If I open discussions here in the forum it is because the company where I work, unfortunately, has no intention of purchasing support. I will continue to push for it but now I have to do without it. Anyway, with "where I can find other useful...
-
fiona replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.I'm waiting for a response from the maintainers.
-
KKrakish replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.Thank you for the fast answer. Living with free version last 2 years but it is time to be part of the community as well. Can I cluster 2 virtual PVEs and move VMs across without license ?
-
LnxBil reacted to MarkusKo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host with
Like.
With one community subscription you can only license one PVE with one socket, the physical host would be the best choice. For testing and playing around you don't need a subscription at all, just use the no-subscription repo. You will have to... -
KKrakish reacted to MarkusKo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host with Like.
With one community subscription you can only license one PVE with one socket, the physical host would be the best choice. For testing and playing around you don't need a subscription at all, just use the no-subscription repo. You will have to...
-
MMarkusKo replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.With one community subscription you can only license one PVE with one socket, the physical host would be the best choice. For testing and playing around you don't need a subscription at all, just use the no-subscription repo. You will have to...
-
fireon reacted to micneu's post in the thread ZFS zvol versehentlich gelöscht - Wiederherstellung möglich? with Like.
Ich denke, es ist am einfachsten und zugleich am sichersten, das Backup wiederherzustellen. -
KKrakish posted the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi folks I got 2 questions I am planning on getting Ryzen 9 9900x 12 cores 24 threads with 128 gigs of memory for homelab physical host. Can I buy 1 community license and run on it proxmox home lab with couple of virtual PVEs and couple of VMs on...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread apt-cacher-ng and proxmox-offline-mirror-docs / proxmox-offline-mirror-helper.Thank you for your Reply. I've also had enough due to these 2 stupid Packages and decided to just mirror the entire pve-no-subscription and pbs-no-subscription Repositories. I am using a heavily patched Version of debmirror (Perl ... sigh...
-
BHow long will my Proxmox VE version be supported? Proxmox VE versions are supported at least as long as the corresponding Debian Version is oldstable. Proxmox VE uses a rolling release model and using the latest stable version is always...
-
UdoB replied to the thread Hardwarer oder Software RAID.Gern ;-) Du hast vermutlich breitere Erfahrungswerte als ich --> unterschiedliche Empfehlungen sehe ich generell als wertvoll an. -
Ttownium reacted to mp_matt's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.0 released! with Like.
Well done to the Proxmox team on the 9.0 release! Congratulations from all of us at MultiPortal.
-
fireon reacted to gyptazy's post in the thread Der Proxday 2026 in Deutschland, Mönchengladbach with Like.
Hey zusammen, gerne möchte ich (einige kennen mich sicherlich bereits von ProxLB, PegaProx und den Ansible Modulen für PVE) euch auf das Community-Event Proxday 2026 aufmerksam machen, der von der credativ GmbH veranstaltet wird. Das Konzept ist...
-
This is not an official version from PBS. ARM is not officially supported by Proxmox. Therefore, it would be better you contact the developers directly via the GitHub repository. https://github.com/dexogen/pipbs/issues They might be able to help... -
CChrisTG74 reacted to a.woll's post in the thread [SOLVED] Nach Update auf v9.0.7 UI zerschossen. Ich bitte um Hilfe. with Like.
Der Fehler ist im Inkognito_Fenster reproduzierbar.
-
CChrisTG74 reacted to milenz's post in the thread Problem with worker VM start initiated by Veeam on PVE with Like.
I worked with Veeam advanced support on this issue. We are seeing that qm start task against the worker VM is getting stuck indefinitely and the only way to get the job to run is to kill the task. Veeam provided me with a private build that...