Latest activity
-
Mmikeely replied to the thread Proxmox Backup Server 4.2 released!.I was specifically talking about S3 immutability specifically, which you did not address. To your point, if an attacker is in backend systems long enough to modify the retention policy in Veeam, wait for the retention to expire, and then delete...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription.I would highly recommend to do this AFTER the upgrade if at all since the upgrade procedure wasn' tested to work with apt pinning (see also https://wiki.debian.org/AptConfiguration and https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian ). It's also not...
-
JJohannes S reacted to justinclift's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription with
Like.
You can move back to the prior kernel (and keep on kernel 6.x) by doing this (this is from memory though, so be careful with it): 1. Create the APT preferences file (/etc/apt/preferences.d/proxmox-default-kernel) which instructs apt to keep on... -
Bboisbleu replied to the thread nicht vergessen: UEFI-Zertifikate Eurer EFI-Disk Instanzen 06.2026!.Gute Frage. Vermutlich wenn EFI Disk und TPM vorhanden sind. Wobei SecureBoot ja nur funktioniert, wenn die Keys ausgerollt werden. Also müsste man mit dem pre-enrolled-keys=1 weiterkommen. Vielleicht weiß jemand anderes, ob es da eine elegante...
-
Aalma21 replied to the thread Supported way for a NAS across multiple nodes that supports thin disks, snapshots, live migrations, move disks, and HA?.Hi, beside the thin layer (for VM disks & snapshots) the listed features are already available on PVE shared LVM and if your SAN supports thin provisioning the thick volume issue should not be a showstopper ... I have also read somewhere in the...
-
HSame here. ixgbe does not build on kernel 7. Thanks for opening the issue on github. My current workaround is to pin kernel 6.17.13-6-pve and build ixgbe-6.3.6. root@pve1:~# modinfo ixgbe | head -2 filename...
-
OOnslow replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot access WebGUI.@Hamlet , here you are :) In fact, at least two options. "Output redirection" E.g. you want to issue ip a and save the result in the file named ip_a.txt ip a > ip_a.txt 2>&1 Notes: a) > overwrites the file b) >> appends to the file c)...
-
DDenary replied to the thread New Proxmox infrastructure on OVH.Hi Nick Ceph or any cluster should only ever operate in one datacentre. <1ms latency between each other. The key to your question is what is your stated RTO/RPO goals? Would you be better hosting in 2 regions with 2 PBS instances which then...
-
Ffloh8 reacted to portedaix's post in the thread Backup speed regression: 2h20m → 8h39m after PVE 8→9 / QEMU 9.2→10.1 / Ceph 18→19 upgrade with Like.
Hi Moayad — image-level results below. Short version: you nailed it. The image itself benches dramatically worse than a scratch image on the same pool, especially in single-thread small/medium I/O. Image identification qm config 162 | grep...
-
Jjpbstark replied to the thread [SOLVED] Connection failed (Code: 1006) w/ Xterm Console.In case someone else finds this, I was able to fix the issue by reinstalling some PVE packages from my node's shell. apt update apt install --reinstall pve-manager proxmox-widget-toolkit libpve-http-server-perl Then refreshed browser and...
-
Rrothkraut replied to the thread nicht vergessen: UEFI-Zertifikate Eurer EFI-Disk Instanzen 06.2026!.Genau auf PVE-Ebene. Über CLI oder ob es irgendwo in den Options zu finden ist.
-
Mmiguelsousa replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription.Hello justinclift, Can this procedure be used on a case where an upgrade from 8.4.x to 9 (latest) will be done? Doing the procedure after dist-upgrade? We want to upgrade but not use 7.0.x kernel for now. Best regards
-
OOnslow replied to the thread Support for PERC H310 Mini on PVE9.Hi, @Tacioandrade . Maybe this? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pbs-4-upgrade-on-a-dell-nx3230-doesnt-fully-boot.183192/post-851045
-
Ddbayer reacted to d.oishi's post in the thread PBS 4.2 No Subscription Repository on a PVE 9.1 server with Enterprise Repository with Like.
If you intend to stay on the older kernel for now, it may be a good idea to review the following security advisory: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-security-advisories.149331/post-850782 If your system is affected...
-
jsterr reacted to uzumo's post in the thread The Reasons for poor performance of Windows when the CPU type is host with Like.
Up to Qemu 11, the only option is “Disabled.” Without hardware acceleration, performance will likely drop significantly. https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/qemu-10-1-available-on-pve-test-and-pve-no-subscription-as-of-now.175350/post-850543 The... -
Aadrianovf posted the thread How to replicate VMKernels and different IPs in proxmox? in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hi, I am migrating from VMware to Proxmox and I was wondering if there is a way to replicate this kind of settings on proxmox? I assume its by using the SDN? But I would like some guidance or tips how to achieve this in proxmox ? Thanks
-
-
HHamlet replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot access WebGUI.This is typically the kind of thing which makes me feel enthusiastic - then I think of it more carefully and realize I will likely create more mess than anything :D. I will keep learning about Proxmox and Linux and hopefully try the upgrade. The...
-
Ddavesimon21 replied to the thread Proxmox VE & UM890 Pro + GPU Passthrough.Did you ever find a solution? I'm having similar issues and ran through the same amount of troubleshooting without much success.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot access WebGUI.There are very few reasons, if ever, for a home-laber running on mini-pc to upgrade from a known stable kernel. Figuring out the reason would require Kernel bisect to find the differences, comparing modules across two kernels, possibly compiling... -
HHamlet replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot access WebGUI.I see that the support for my Proxmox version (8.4) ends soon- I would guess it's another reason for me to upgrade sooner than later to Proxmox 9 ?
