[SOLVED] Node red but VM running

H

hellb0y77

Active Member
Mar 12, 2014
33
0
26
Hi i have node red but all VM works without problem, i can't stop VM because some is in production, i tried to restart pveproxy without success
This my pveversion -v
Code: 
proxmox-ve: 4.1-41 (running kernel: 4.2.8-1-pve)
pve-manager: 4.1-22 (running version: 4.1-22/aca130cf)
pve-kernel-4.2.8-1-pve: 4.2.8-41
lvm2: 2.02.116-pve2
corosync-pve: 2.3.5-2
libqb0: 1.0-1
pve-cluster: 4.0-36
qemu-server: 4.0-64
pve-firmware: 1.1-7
libpve-common-perl: 4.0-54
libpve-access-control: 4.0-13
libpve-storage-perl: 4.0-45
pve-libspice-server1: 0.12.5-2
vncterm: 1.2-1
pve-qemu-kvm: 2.5-9
pve-container: 1.0-52
pve-firewall: 2.0-22
pve-ha-manager: 1.0-25
ksm-control-daemon: 1.2-1
glusterfs-client: 3.5.2-2+deb8u1
lxc-pve: 1.1.5-7
lxcfs: 2.0.0-pve2
cgmanager: 0.39-pve1
criu: 1.6.0-1
 

Attachments

  • 003.png
    003.png
    10.7 KB · Views: 6
hellb0y77 said:
Hi i have node red but all VM works without problem, i can't stop VM because some is in production, i tried to restart pveproxy without success
This my pveversion -v
Code: 
proxmox-ve: 4.1-41 (running kernel: 4.2.8-1-pve)
pve-manager: 4.1-22 (running version: 4.1-22/aca130cf)
pve-kernel-4.2.8-1-pve: 4.2.8-41
lvm2: 2.02.116-pve2
corosync-pve: 2.3.5-2
libqb0: 1.0-1
pve-cluster: 4.0-36
qemu-server: 4.0-64
pve-firmware: 1.1-7
libpve-common-perl: 4.0-54
libpve-access-control: 4.0-13
libpve-storage-perl: 4.0-45
pve-libspice-server1: 0.12.5-2
vncterm: 1.2-1
pve-qemu-kvm: 2.5-9
pve-container: 1.0-52
pve-firewall: 2.0-22
pve-ha-manager: 1.0-25
ksm-control-daemon: 1.2-1
glusterfs-client: 3.5.2-2+deb8u1
lxc-pve: 1.1.5-7
lxcfs: 2.0.0-pve2
cgmanager: 0.39-pve1
criu: 1.6.0-1
Click to expand...

Is all your storage looking ok from that node. That is the typical cause when I hit this issue.
 
This node uses as backup a storage mounted via cifs, this morning the storage was not reachable so I unmounted and remounted, now everything works but the web interface gives me this problem
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom