Hello friends,
Please find the 2 Attachments. [LEFT PUTTY = VM1st(ny) & RIGHT PUTTY = VM2nd(555) ]
My Leased SERVER DETAILS:
it's 6 Cores and 12 Threads intel CPU
32 GB RAM
2 NVME Drive 512GB
-
PROXMOX NODE Details.
- During setup Selected Zfs Raid1 for 2x Nvme drive (mirroring purpose)
ARC limited to 6 GB
No Swap created during Installation.
Now Main issues and confusions I'm having is that.
I created 2 Virtual Machines.
1) VM = named (NY) - Created 1 socket 3 cores .. RAM = 7 GB, Installed Centos 7 with default Partitioning. (which is lvm)
Selected Disk = zfs - Raw format - No Cache default.
2nd) VM= named (555) Created 1 socket 3 cores.. RAM = 7 GB, Installed Centos 7 with custom partitioning (xfs and standard)
Selected Disk = qcow2 format - No Cache default.. ( I created as directory /tanky on datacenter and choose this option instead of ZFS to allot the disk space for this VM-555)
Confusion #1: I ran several DISK BENCHMARK TEST on both VMs and I found that I'm having odd results. on VM.. I think DISK PERFORMANCE IS BETTER ON my 2nd VM named 555 in some benchmarks WHY? Due to I choose qcow2 and created new directory instead of ZFS ??
Confusion # 2: Since I used zfs Raid1 for mirroring and redundancy purpose..
But for my 2nd VM I didn't go with default zfs (raw format) and instead I created NEW directory location (path = /tanky) -- So VMs or DATA in Non ZPOOL Directory will be still get mirrored ? Or Zfs raw format with default location will be mirror only?
PLEASE HELP and Suggest me Which one is good to go and kindly check the both attachments. [LEFT PUTTY = VM1st(ny) & RIGHT PUTTY = VM2nd(555) ]
My real concern is DISK PEFROMANCE for my Nginix and Apache Server (CentOS Web Panel) Application AND DATA Redundancy ?
Thank You very much for you attention,
Peace
Sandes
Please find the 2 Attachments. [LEFT PUTTY = VM1st(ny) & RIGHT PUTTY = VM2nd(555) ]
My Leased SERVER DETAILS:
it's 6 Cores and 12 Threads intel CPU
32 GB RAM
2 NVME Drive 512GB
-
PROXMOX NODE Details.
- During setup Selected Zfs Raid1 for 2x Nvme drive (mirroring purpose)
ARC limited to 6 GB
No Swap created during Installation.
Now Main issues and confusions I'm having is that.
I created 2 Virtual Machines.
1) VM = named (NY) - Created 1 socket 3 cores .. RAM = 7 GB, Installed Centos 7 with default Partitioning. (which is lvm)
Selected Disk = zfs - Raw format - No Cache default.
2nd) VM= named (555) Created 1 socket 3 cores.. RAM = 7 GB, Installed Centos 7 with custom partitioning (xfs and standard)
Selected Disk = qcow2 format - No Cache default.. ( I created as directory /tanky on datacenter and choose this option instead of ZFS to allot the disk space for this VM-555)
Confusion #1: I ran several DISK BENCHMARK TEST on both VMs and I found that I'm having odd results. on VM.. I think DISK PERFORMANCE IS BETTER ON my 2nd VM named 555 in some benchmarks WHY? Due to I choose qcow2 and created new directory instead of ZFS ??
Confusion # 2: Since I used zfs Raid1 for mirroring and redundancy purpose..
But for my 2nd VM I didn't go with default zfs (raw format) and instead I created NEW directory location (path = /tanky) -- So VMs or DATA in Non ZPOOL Directory will be still get mirrored ? Or Zfs raw format with default location will be mirror only?
PLEASE HELP and Suggest me Which one is good to go and kindly check the both attachments. [LEFT PUTTY = VM1st(ny) & RIGHT PUTTY = VM2nd(555) ]
My real concern is DISK PEFROMANCE for my Nginix and Apache Server (CentOS Web Panel) Application AND DATA Redundancy ?
Thank You very much for you attention,
Peace
Sandes
Attachments
Last edited: