Hello!
I'm backing up an LXC with rootfs and 2 extra ZFS mount points.
Since the backup was unusually slow I tried the backup without compression and found judging by the tar file size that it quickly backs up all the data (tar file was 15G pretty quickly) and then spent a whole lot of time doing "something". I noticed 50M/s disk reads on the source disk, tar using 8% of the 4 CPU cores at the same time whilst disk writes to the backup disk were pretty much non-existent.
Might that delay have something to do with the --sparse option of tar? Or do additional mount points have a negative effect?
Is anyone else experiencing similar?
I'm backing up an LXC with rootfs and 2 extra ZFS mount points.
Code:
vpool/subvol-120-disk-0 909M 7.11G 909M /vpool/subvol-120-disk-0
vpool/subvol-120-disk-1-mysql-data 14.2G 25.8G 14.2G /vpool/subvol-120-disk-1-mysql-data
vpool/subvol-120-disk-2-mysql-log 445M 79.6G 445M /vpool/subvol-120-disk-2-mysql-log
Since the backup was unusually slow I tried the backup without compression and found judging by the tar file size that it quickly backs up all the data (tar file was 15G pretty quickly) and then spent a whole lot of time doing "something". I noticed 50M/s disk reads on the source disk, tar using 8% of the 4 CPU cores at the same time whilst disk writes to the backup disk were pretty much non-existent.
Might that delay have something to do with the --sparse option of tar? Or do additional mount points have a negative effect?
Is anyone else experiencing similar?