L
laradji
Guest
Is it possible to reproduce that bug - how?
No it's was not , but it seem that vm how have work to do crash more often.
Is it possible to reproduce that bug - how?
# pveversion -v
pve-manager: 1.5-5 (pve-manager/1.5/4627)
running kernel: 2.6.32-1-pve
proxmox-ve-2.6.32: 1.5-4
pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve: 2.6.32-4
qemu-server: 1.1-11
pve-firmware: 1.0-3
libpve-storage-perl: 1.0-8
vncterm: 0.9-2
vzctl: 3.0.23-1pve7
vzdump: 1.2-5
vzprocps: 2.0.11-1dso2
vzquota: 3.0.11-1
pve-qemu-kvm: 0.11.1-2
ksm-control-daemon: 1.0-2
I leave the dd stress test running for about 20hours on two gest, and gives no problems.. so i thought that removing host's cpufreq ondemand governor (i don't know why was enabled on hetzner's default installation) and upgrading guest lenny's kernel to squeeze's one solves this problem.
Today i re-created everything from scratch, in order to install my VM, i build a brand new guest, installed lenny, installed few packages, updated kernel to squeeze's one.. re-run a dd test ( dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test bs=1M count=1000 ) and the second time I launch it, every problems come back:
It starts with:
[ 140.177741] BUG: Bad page state in process dd pfn:dae7d
Then:
[ 140.216248] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000006
Andstarts with "Cpu Stuck",
[ 273.808162] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [rm:1975]
(i can attach full dmesg log if it helps..)So, i can't trust this platform for my production enviroment.. :|
ProxmoxVE is manually installed a Debian lenny hosted at Hetzner.deCode:# pveversion -v pve-manager: 1.5-5 (pve-manager/1.5/4627) running kernel: 2.6.32-1-pve proxmox-ve-2.6.32: 1.5-4 pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve: 2.6.32-4 qemu-server: 1.1-11 pve-firmware: 1.0-3 libpve-storage-perl: 1.0-8 vncterm: 0.9-2 vzctl: 3.0.23-1pve7 vzdump: 1.2-5 vzprocps: 2.0.11-1dso2 vzquota: 3.0.11-1 pve-qemu-kvm: 0.11.1-2 ksm-control-daemon: 1.0-2
The guest is a i386 debian, everything in ext3, with 4cores assigned, virtio disk and network, disk is stored on a LVM group over a SW raid mirror..
Is there something that I can do to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance
k.
I would go for the default 1.5 version - 2.6.18 kernel. And I would never use sw raid.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.