Search results

Test it with live iso (debian, ubuntu),

Apples and oranges. You are comparing PRODUCT (based on the debian + ubuntu) with pure OS (debian).

PVE (9.1.1): domains.cfg: ad: SUB.EXAMPLE.ORG comment AD authentication domain sub.example.org server1 fqdn1 base_dn DC=sub,DC=example,DC=org case-sensitive 1 default 1 mode ldaps server2 fqdn2 user.cfg...

AD realm is created manually in domains.cfg. This works Editing via gui "Sync options" failing. "Sync" via gui Realms failing - unedited error message: 2025-12-10T10:53:48+01:00: this is a DRY RUN - changes will not be persisted 2025-12-10T10:53:48+01:00: TASK ERROR: LDAP operation result: rc=1...

Any option to have "cluster name" or alias for cluster in remotes? Having cluster hidden under hostname is little confusing...

With manual "base-dn" configuration and any change in the "Sync Options" api error (status = 400: Could not search LDAP realm, base_dn could be incorrect: LDAP operation result: rc=1 (operationsError), dn: "", text: "00002020: Operation unavailable without authentication": rc=1...

Adding domains.cfg with "base-dn" works. But with "base_dn" don't: api error (status = 400: parsing "/etc/proxmox-datacenter-manager/access/domains.cfg" failed: line 2 - unknown property 'base_dn') The returned error in the first post use "base_dn". Next, in the "Sync options", when trying...

Hi, those bars are bad readable. Can you please think about better coloring schema to differentiate usage? I am not blind but in the first two it hardly to see some orange spikes or so. is

Hi, trying to add AD realm with anonymous search (without bind user): api error (status = 400: Could not search LDAP realm, base_dn could be incorrect: LDAP operation result: rc=1 (operationsError), dn: "", text: "00002020: Operation unavailable without authentication": rc=1 (operationsError)...

Why PDM use by default nicX variant as network interface name instead ensX as PMG, pve VMs etc? When trying to add AD server, it doesn't work in anonymous mode - but almost the same PVE gui configuration is working, only one difference is a field for base_dn.

Your SAN and iscsi_* are on the same vlan, so if you can't ping, your L2 doesn't work. Check tcpdump for arp and fix firewall/network config.

It looks as https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/test-migration-stuck.168776/

Really HP G6 (super old server) and SSD? DId you even tested disk performance on the host?

Define "accidental reboots". User Via ssh? Install it. User via gui? Don't know.

It's all about where is vlan tagged and when it's native vlan vs vlan on port/bridge. If esxi vswitch required vlan id for every vnic, linux standard/vlan-aware/openvswitch allow all variants.

PVE/ssh by default listen on all interfaces, so it's possible to connect via mgmt, corosync, storage etc IPs. If you don't need very high performance (100 Gbps networks), i will use 9000 only on limited scope, for example, dedicated vmbr/vlan for the storage.

Depends on nic utilization, but we use the switch way for our 3 nodes cluster: 1x lacp (2 ports) with vlans for management (= ceph public), for vm, for corosync, etc 2x lacp (2 ports) with vlans for corosync, for ceph storage Mesh is for small number of nodes or when the switch is too costly...

I am not using such config variant, so i can theoretize it looks ok. But i am using vlans everywhere and never assign ip to bridge, but using subinterface every time. Anyway, PVE can access multiple networks without fw/router. For nfs access you even don't need to have bridge - if physical card...

options: script it use mlag switches multipath etc etc

PMG is mainly for mailserver to mailserver communication. If you are trying sending mail from non mailservers, send those mails to exchange first. Or https://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#relay and test.