Search results

I figured it out. When doing a "restore" of a CT, proxmox defaults to "non priviliged" when restoring the CT. In the restore dialog box you have to specifically uncheck "non priviliged" to get the CT to be restored as a priviliged CT like it was in the beginning.

I'm not entirely positive, but now that I think about it, I created this CT as "privileged". But after the restore, I *think* that it changed it to "non privileged" CT.

Hi, I have a proxmox v6 host. I made a backup of CT105 from the gui. Then I went to my container 105 (happens to be CentOS 7) and I did a yum update. But after the update I could no longer mount the NFS4 file system shares. It is an external NFS server called lurch not part of proxmox. Up...

I see now what the problem is. On my PVE host I didn't have the user "ceramext" in the /etc/passwd file. On my existing PVE host which is version 3, it wasn't necessary for the mapping to be passed to the CT. But with proxmox 6, looks like I do have to have all of the users in the /etc/passwd...

Thanks Republicus. I was missing no_root_squash from my NFS server's exports. I added it, refreshed everything and the problem persists. Here is my /etc/pve/storage.cfg dir: local path /var/lib/vz content iso,vztmpl,backup lvmthin: local-lvm thinpool data vgname...

I've posted a question to linuxquestions.org about a problem I'm having mapping IDs with NFS4 from a physical CentOs 6 NFS4 server and a proxmox CT CentOs 7 NFS4 client. I'm pretty certain this is NOT a proxmox issue, but figured I'd ask. My question is, is there any configuration on a proxmox...

What I did was recreate the container as privileged then under Options -> Features I can select/enable "Nesting" and "NFS"

I've been reading up on privileged containers. And now I'm wondering if I'd best not use a CT and AppArmor if this is considered as unsafe as mentioned in the section above. What I want are several guests, all using NFS to an external NFS server. Some guests using a lot of reads, some guests...

I want to have NFS client mount points within a CentOs 7 guest container. The NFS server is not on the proxmox host. The proxmox 6 host is able to mount these external NFS systems. The guest CT can ping the external NFS server. On the proxmox 6 gui, I go to the container where I want to mount...

Sorry, I'll post properly ....

I've installed a new proxmox 6 host. it resolves DNS fine. for a centos CT I selected to use the host's DNS. This created a good /etc/resolv.conf on the CT. But DNS is not resolving on the CT. I checked my host and it does have apparmor. So, I attempted to remove it and got this warning, not...

I haven't finished my work in post #3 but I'm still planning on making that move to serve samba shares directly from the proxmox server instead of a separate physical server. Here is that original link...

I went ahead and posted my problem to the Samba list. The answer I got back was that using NFS in the manner I was is considered "unreliable". I'll setup Samba on my proxmox server and deliver shares directly to the clients instead of using NFS. -- Dean

Hmmm, in edit mode that little mono spaced picture looks ok, but not in display mode.......

I apologize for cross posting this with LinuxQuestions.org. I posted there, but have not heard back. And now I'm wondering if I'm using an unsupported proxmox design. I have proxmox 5. And I'm using the underlying debian NFS export (not a VM or container). Then sending this to a separate...

Thanks Dietmar, I did a cat of /etc/pve/storage.cfg which showed that "local-zfs" is my storageID. That must be the default. I didn't see the storageID with "zfs status". But its in the storage.cfg. Using that storageID I then was able to do a pct restore 105...

Since -pool doesn't go together with zfs pools, what is the propr format of the restore?

I'm in the process of moving my VMs on a proxmox v3.4 system to a proxmox v5.1 system. I dumped a VM from the v3.4 system and copied it to the v5.1 system, but I'm having trouble getting "pct restore" to recognize my pool name. At least I think thats the problem. I have a pool on the v5.1...

Hi Wolfgang, that helped. Using vmbr1 instead of eth1 took care of that issue. At least for external hosts on the 10.2.8.* network they can get to the proxmox host now. However, the proxmox guests still cannot get to the proxmox host. The proxmox host is 10.2.8.1 and one of the guests is...

I have Proxmox 3.4-1 installed. I have setup networking pieces successfully, but I want to block most SSH traffic and allow a few, and have managed to block all SSH traffic instead. On my public IPv4 interface, "vmbr0" I'm blocking everybody for SSH. This works. What I want is for some of my...