Proxmox v4 OpenVZ Alternative

starnetwork said:
I also suggest to leave maybe both LXC/LXD and Virtuozzo (when it's will be ready)
I believe that native support will be stable and better than GUI patches
Click to expand...

I am not sure if you really know what you talk about. You already tested LXD (we do not use that at all) and Virtuozzo?
 
starnetwork said:
2. as for the Network isolation, I mean, give max of 10Mbps for each Container, so ddos attack in the container level not down all the other Containers at same node or even all the cabinet
Click to expand...

We have/use tc, but that is no 100% isolation.
 
Hi, I tested Virtuozzo in the commercal version as part of the PCS and it's work well
I did only very quick overview with LXC
 
I have mainly OpenVZ containers on Proxmox 3.3 running. Can I backup these containers on 3.3 and restore them on 4.0 proxmox?
 
starnetwork said:
Hi, I tested Virtuozzo in the commercal version as part of the PCS and it's work well
Click to expand...

We have to consider other things also - "works well" is a basic requirement, but other thinks makes it more or less
incompatible with our software and goals.
 
starnetwork said:
Hi, I tested Virtuozzo in the commercal version as part of the PCS and it's work well
I did only very quick overview with LXC
Click to expand...
Why is this even a discussion? Isn't Virtuozzo proprietary?

Everything you say Virtuozzo is better at already works with LXC in PVE4 beta...

FYI: the ddos prevention scenario you quote should be done on your router, not on the VM interface. If it reaches the virtual interface, then your physical interface is probably already drowning in traffic.
 
Hi Stewge,
1. virtuozzo v7 is Open source, you can see it here: http://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/7.0/x86_64/iso
2. it's can be additionally to the LXC, for example as SolusVM Virtualization gui support OpenVZ, Linux KVM, Xen Paravirtualization and Xen HVM
3. about the networking
a. the limit should be in both levels of switch and node
b. for automation vps provisioning, as many companies do, set BW on router level for each container is not so easy...

Regards,
 
schannall said:
What benefits would that bring to replace LXC with virtuozzo? Why should this be done? What are the drawbacks of LXC in your eyes?
I like the Choice of LXC ( and would welcome the possibility to have Docker containers as well but that is a whole different story :)

sC
Click to expand...

Dockers got you covered. https://docs.docker.com/machine/

just use the generic driver. or make a proxmox one. i would not complain :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom