In first time it seem that all were working with new kernel, but few time later, we obtain again low result in kvm...
Proxmox team not seem able (or don't want) review it, so I search an profesional that can be able to help us, I contact you firstly as seem you have a lot of experience of this.
Do you have any prevision of days/weeks/months to have any time for this or do you know any profesional that able to review our problem?
Finally, I still with performance that are not seem good and proxmox support don't give me any help about this (I have paid 400€ for no solution to our problem)...
Do you able to offer profesional service to review our config and tell us if there is any way to increase result? if yes please write me to email@example.com...
I have obtain an very good result by changing /sys/class/scsi_disk/0\:0\:0\:0/cache_type parameter on beta proxmox4 node, same change on proxmox3.4 have no effect, do you know why or what have changed into proxmox4 to have this result? Is correct to put "write through" in /sys/class/scsi_disk/0\:0\:0\:0/cache_type proxmox node?
I will try to rebuild an DRBD config on proxmox4 cluster to see if it's work also with this.
Thanks a lot
Excuse me if i am causing disturbances, but I have a new problem, i can not download from the repo git the "drbd-8.4.git" since this morning (now is of night):
shell> git clone git://git.drbd.org/drbd-8.4.git
Apparently, there are problems with this portal, so that i would like to ask you if you can send me in a tar.gz by email the program. My email is firstname.lastname@example.org
Excuse me please if I am bothering you again, but i have now a little problem with drbd-utils 8.9.1 version and LVM, maybe you can help me again, if you can't help me, i will understand it. Anyway, many thanks for all your valuable help.
Hello mir, thank you again for your help in my Proxmox VE 3.3. and Freenas 9.2.7 ZFS via iSCSI thread. I have a small question regarding the creation of a VM on the ZFS storage. What confuses me is that when I try to setup a new VM on the ZFS ZVOL target, i cannot choose a different HDD format than raw disk image. As far as I understand it, I won't be able to do snapshots of my VMs with that format. Shouldn't that be different, too? Sorry, just a little side question, that I didn't find suiting for the thread. With kind regards, MisterIX.