Latest activity
-
MManuS replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9.2.21 - BCM57412 bnxt_en network failure after upgrade to kernel 7.0.14-20-pve.Hi, I didn't send new logs with new firmware, but yes, new firmware installed is 38.11.70.00 downloaded from Dell support web site. If needed, I can restart my server with kernel 7.0.14-20-pve and send you logs. Regards
-
Sstrehi replied to the thread DKIM Signatur Zeitstempel/Ablaufdatum.Done. #8103 Thanks Bernd
-
Sshowiproute replied to the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox VE 9.1 & Broadcom BCM57412 10G SFP Dual Port PCIE adapter.I do have problems when using the 7.0.14-20-pve kernel - if using 7.0.14-17-pve everything is fine.
-
AAndre_B replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9.2.21 - BCM57412 bnxt_en network failure after upgrade to kernel 7.0.14-20-pve.Can confirm the same issue here, adding another data point since we're on a different BCM model (BCM57416, not 57412/57508/57504 like others in this thread). Environment: Kernel 7.0.14-20-pve → issue; pinned back to 7.0.14-19-pve → stable...
-
-
ProxmoxSecurityAdvisory replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment - Security Advisories.Subject: PSA-2026-00053-1: PBS backup access includes host/NNN groups Advisory date: 2026-10-01 Packages: libpve-storage-perl Details: If a configured PBS storage contained backup groups with type host, but numerical backup IDs, such... -
ProxmoxSecurityAdvisory replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment - Security Advisories.Subject: PSA-2026-00052-1: Command injection via import of malicious OVA file Advisory date: 2026-10-01 Packages: libpve-storage-perl, qemu-server Details: Insufficient restrictions of OVA member file names allowed an attacker with sufficient...
-
Mmgeckler replied to the thread VM becomes unresponsive during Veeam backup.You can still do Test 5, a reboot of the VM is not necessary. Live migrating a VM to a different host is enough.
-
OOnslow reacted to celemine1gig's post in the thread Slow/hanging Proxmox consoles after upgrade to 9.2.20 (from 9.2.4) with
Like.
You are on RaptorLake-S (judging by the PCI IDs) and are seeing issues where such a relatively old Kernel (in relation to the platform itself) is performing better, than a newer one? What motherboard are we talking about? This sounds a bit like a... -
OOnslow reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] PVE 9.2 ARM64 on ASUS GX10 (GB10): 6 GB/s of NVMe/TCP out of the box, 29 GB/s after two kernel flags with Like.
One more GX10 post, the last one for now. After battling the black screen, the hard resets and the power cap, we were finally able to see what this box and PVE on arm64 can do. Out of the box, the kernel initiator managed NVMe/TCP reads at 6.3...
-
OA few points I would add to the answers above: Single socket does not automatically mean “one NUMA node”. On EPYC this depends on the NPS setting (NPS1/2/4), and Intel has a similar concept with SNC. Since you specifically require at least 64...
-
Falk R. replied to the thread USV Software Empfehlung für APC und Proxmox Cluster.Ja und da Proxmox ein Debian Unterbau hat, funktioniert das ja. Ob da ein PVE auf dem Debian drauf ist, interessiert die Software nicht. Ich nutze PCNS mit PVE seit 2019 produktiv bei Kunden und es gab nie Probleme, da Proxmox ja keine keine... -
CChrisTG74 replied to the thread LAG / VLAN on node setup.Please guys, there is already a patch available for quite a long time and this is crucial for serious setups in enterprise-environments IMHO. Thanks!
-
COpen feature request: Bugzilla #2164 There is currently no information on specific timelines for including this functionality in the distribution. It is known that a corresponding patch was proposed on the pve-devel mailing list, but it has not...
-
OI second here, NUMA stuff sometimes make slowdowns hard to pin, when you find out a process is basically poking the neighbor through que inter socket interconnect. So go single socket if possible
-
OHi @ns33, It really depends on your applications. Neither vendor is a universally "better" choice, and the right answer comes from the workloads you plan to run. That said, my general preference is single-socket servers for anything network or...
-
Ffcarneiro posted the thread [SOLVED] NUT UPS stopped working after upgrade from PVE 8 to 9 in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello, I just upgraded a server running Proxmox version 8 (PVE 8.4.19, Debian 12.14, kernel 6.8.12-30-pve) to version 9 (PVE 9.2.21, Debian 13.7, kernel 7.0.14-20-pve) and the NUT UPS server/monitor stopped working. It doesn't connect to the UPS...
-
Mmcdy replied to the thread Proxmox random reboots on HP Elitedesk 800g4 - fixed with proxmox install on top of Debian 12 - now issues with hardware transcoding in plex.Short update, after upgrade to VE9 I had the issue again. So I ordered a DP dummy dongle and will set my GRUB config back to default. Hope all is good then. Cheers!
-
DDennigma posted the thread [SOLVED] Regression in 7.0.14-20-pve: Realtek RTL8168h/r8169 fails with PCIe AER/DPC error – 7.0.14-19-pve works in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hi, I have found what appears to be a reproducible network regression between Proxmox kernels 7.0.14-19-pve and 7.0.14-20-pve. The affected NIC is: 02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 PCI...
-
Ppascals07 replied to the thread Détection virtiofs.exe par antivirus ESET.Nous n'avons pas eu d'impact, la version installée sur le serveur concerné est celle-ci : Je n'ai pas eu le même comportement sur d'autres serveurs ayant la même version .. à surveiller ! Pas d'effet de bord pour l'instant sur le serveur ou...
-
-
Ppascals07 posted the thread Détection virtiofs.exe par antivirus ESET in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Bonjour, J'attire votre attention sur une détection de l'antivirus ESET qui est apparue ce jour : C'est donc un des composants lié aux outils d'intégration Proxmox ... J'ai trouvé une news très récente relatant cette information ...
-
