Latest activity
-
Pproxuser77 reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] Does this update require a reboot? with
Like.
With actual server hardware you are running it in a company and then you should have a cluster anyway if you need high-availability. -
JJohannes S reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with Like.
Additional tech-note for ARM platform: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-arm64-on-asus-gx10-gb10-hard-reset-every-20-minutes-fix-is-loading-sbsa_gwdt.186164/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth.Sure but I think we can agree, that the situation get's much worse (due to a larger scale) as soon as script kiddies gets envolved ;) And at least that impact would be avoided by actually not running EOL systems and not exposing hypervisors to...
-
JJohannes S reacted to patpat0's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Purely theoretically, we don't know how long this bug has been exploited since it was possible to do anything, including clearing logs. Only now have script kiddies gotten their hands on it.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)!.Additional tech-note for ARM platform: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-arm64-on-asus-gx10-gb10-hard-reset-every-20-minutes-fix-is-loading-sbsa_gwdt.186164/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -... -
bbgeek17 posted the thread [TUTORIAL] PVE arm64 on ASUS GX10 (GB10): hard reset every ~20 minutes, fix is loading sbsa_gwdt in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Here’s another problem we hit bringing PVE arm64 up on the GX10. The first was the black screen after initrd (thread here). Posting this one since the symptom is a show stopper. Hardware ASUS Ascent GX10 NVIDIA GB10, 20 cores, 3.9 GHz 128 GB...
-
Wwoodstock reacted to Burkhard Linke's post in the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future with Like.
Any idea when these important changes will be available in the pve-enterprise repository?
-
BBurkhard Linke replied to the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future.Any idea when these important changes will be available in the pve-enterprise repository?
-
Iiceph03nix posted the thread Best Practice for moving backups to a namespace while maintaining the existing backup job chains in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.I'm looking at moving our backup targets around on PBS to make better use of namespace specific pruning jobs, and I'm curious before I make any changes if there's a best practice for moving the files so that when the backup jobs are retargetted...
-
torbho reacted to mu5h3r's post in the thread Very frequent AppArmor logs after updating PVE with Like.
In my case, setting up AppArmor inside containers helped. pct enter <id> echo "/run/systemd/journal/dev-log rw," >> /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.rsyslogd apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.rsyslogd reboot This is probably what fiona... -
Wwaynej replied to the thread KVM NX huge page recovery burns a core per guest on kernel 7.0.x.Thanks for the feedback. bpftrace would not work on 6.17 as possible_nx_huge_pages structure is different. On 6.19+ it's an array of per-MMU-type structs. On 6.17 its a list of pointers. Interesting that you are seeing the thread spikes on...
-
Dd0glesby replied to the thread Kernel 7.0.14-14-pve: immediate reset + CPU machine check when igb loads on I350 (Dell XC730xd) — 6.14 unaffected.Yes, I have all of these enabled on systems that give the option to enable or disable.
-
Dd0glesby replied to the thread Kernel 7.0.14-14-pve: immediate reset + CPU machine check when igb loads on I350 (Dell XC730xd) — 6.14 unaffected.I'm also running PVE 9 with the 7.0 kernels on Dell R720, R720xd, R730, R730xd, R740, R750 systems. I've not seen this behaviour. I'd have to check and see what the mix of network interfaces are across all the systems, but it's a mix of onboard...
-
EErnst T. reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Yes, my view is indeed quite limited: The Internet would be in a better state if people would not run EOL systems on it. But you are missing my actual point: It's pointless to clean an infected system since you might have missed an unknown...
-
Nns33 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox announces global 24/7 enterprise support and launches Proxmox North America Inc. with Like.
We are pleased to share two major milestones that will help us better serve our customers and partners worldwide. Global 24/7 enterprise support Starting October 19, 2026, Proxmox Enterprise Support will be available around the clock, 365 days a...
-
UdoB reacted to patpat0's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Purely theoretically, we don't know how long this bug has been exploited since it was possible to do anything, including clearing logs. Only now have script kiddies gotten their hands on it. -
UdoB reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth with Like.
Obviously this is possible, since anyone can compile the kernel as he sees fit. However, I do not believe that Proxmox VE or their community needs to invest time nor resources to maintain (extreme) EOL systems. I also believe Johannes S is...
-
Ppatpat0 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 7 is vulnerable to some type of 0day/RCE non auth.Purely theoretically, we don't know how long this bug has been exploited since it was possible to do anything, including clearing logs. Only now have script kiddies gotten their hands on it.
-
Jjtru reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future with Like.
There is now a newer pve-manager with version 9.2.12 available on the pve-test repo and a backport of that as 8.4.22 for PVE 8's pvetest repo, matching our respective test repo of the ceph-squid and ceph-tentacle releases. There is some better...
-
Sspschumacher replied to the thread Creating snippets using PVE API.Same here... @ Proxmox Team: Is the ability to create or remove snippets on the roadmap?