Latest activity
-
AAleXSR700 posted the thread PVE becomes unreachable via ethernet but OS is running in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hi everyone, I am new to PVE but have setup most things I wanted in my test PVE. Unfortunately, the PVE itself and all VMs/LXCs become unreachable via ethernet from time to time and become immediately reachable again as soon as I log in on the...
-
Aawado replied to the thread [SOLVED] Kein TOTP-Login mehr möglich nach Zeitfehler.Ok, dank KI & OpenCode konnte ich die Ursache jetzt doch selbst finden (lassen): In "/etc/pve/priv/tfa.cfg" wurde der Zugang gesperrt mit …"totp-locked":true… . Wenn man dort das auf "false" setzt, geht es wieder. Ich lass den Post mal so stehen...
-
Aawado posted the thread [SOLVED] Kein TOTP-Login mehr möglich nach Zeitfehler in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Ich wollte auf einem Hetzner Dedicated nun endlich mal das Upgrade zu PVE 9 machen. Bei den Vorbereitungen über SSH fiel mir auf, dass die Systemzeit nicht stimmt und deswegen der Login in der Proxmox-Weboberfläche nicht mehr per TOTP möglich...
-
PProxonaut replied to the thread Proxmox install on Minisforum ms-01.So they heats up quick are you saying that usually ?
-
Ccelemine1gig replied to the thread Started getting this warning on a VM where I pass through a SATA controller on proxmox 9.2..It might be, that feature compatability between QEMU and kernel version "causes" this message. That means one side trying to use a feature that the other cannot deal with. Easy to try out, if you are right with your assumption. Looking forward to...
-
Fdid you solve it? (since it says 'SOLVED' in the tile) if yes, what was the problem? maybe someone else can profit from your solution
-
Sslavik-f replied to the thread Proxmox 9.2 installer hangs: waiting for /dev to be fully populated.1. I think that because of NovaCore, the Proxmox 9.2 doesn't work with Nvidia RTX cards. `nomodeset` doesn't help. 2. In some cases, during upgrade, something is failing / misconfigured with the network stack, so even SSH access is not available...
-
Ccelemine1gig replied to the thread Started getting this warning on a VM where I pass through a SATA controller on proxmox 9.2..The kernel version is irrelevant, if you answer none of the other questions. Here is the exact code line where this is coming from: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/hw/vfio/region.c#L324 Same code is not included in QEMU 10.1...
-
Ffranko5 reacted to cyrenbyren's post in the thread Console ends up with "connection timed out" with
Like.
I'm using a single dns entry (as PVE is a consul service in my network), to point to all the nodes in my proxmox cluster. All of them have their own unique SSL certificate, but all of them also have a common name (let's call it pve.my.domain)... -
Ccelemine1gig replied to the thread Started getting this warning on a VM where I pass through a SATA controller on proxmox 9.2..And what exactly is the issue here? How often do you see this message? Why does it bother you? As you might have already seen in your search, this start with kernels >v6.19. However, from what I read, it is intended just to be that, a "warning"...
-
Aabador replied to the thread Proxmox 9.2 installer hangs: waiting for /dev to be fully populated.any idea why is this happening? I'm hving the same issue
-
Falk R. replied to the thread Hardwarer oder Software RAID.Bei den HDDs würde ich aus Performancegründen gar kein ZFS bevorzugen. Mit HW Raid und ext4 / LVM Thin fährt man da deutlich besser. Außerdem soll das je eh nicht produktiv werden sondern ist zum Erfahrungen sammeln. -
Ich habe mich heute mal damit beschäftigt wie man VMs in Masse oder gezielt über Ansible oder Terraform ausrollen kann. Hier meine kleine Mitschrift https://pad.cooltux.net/MB4j0lq1S_CzII7zs0r66A Grüße -
Vvirtualizerforlife replied to the thread is it possible to have zero access to the self hosted PVE incase of robbery.What are the keywords specifically for this? I'm not sure if its zero trust, encryption, end-to-end encryption or something else? What I should be searching for? How do you guard the datacenter? You don't mean physical guarding?
-
Vvirtualizerforlife reacted to leesteken's post in the thread is it possible to have zero access to the self hosted PVE incase of robbery with Like.
If you can find a way to do this with Linux then you can probably also do this with Proxmox (and I'll help you if there are Proxmox specific issues). You might want to consider robbers that steal your computer wile keeping it powered, if you are...
-
Vvirtualizerforlife reacted to fireon's post in the thread [BUG] TOTP window freezes sometimes when attempting to login and unable to click anything with Like.
Hmm... it might just be that it loses focus. I've seen this happen when you have a password manager like Bitwarden or KeePassX installed in a Chrome-based browser. In that case, it helps not to click on the TOTP window, click somewhere else...
-
Vvirtualizerforlife replied to the thread [BUG] TOTP window freezes sometimes when attempting to login and unable to click anything.That is interesting because I had to change the browser to make it to work and this browser didn't have password manager installed like on the firefox. My totp is located in password manager that is in the system software so the password manager...
-
Vvirtualizerforlife posted the thread is it possible to have zero access to the self hosted PVE incase of robbery in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.If a thieves were to enter in to my house and I had my proxmox VE up and running, unencrypted. Doesn't this mean that they can access everything they want on my PVE serve (containers, services, etc.)? If this is true, then how do I protect myself...
-
RResidentDataHoarder replied to the thread [SOLVED] CEPH OSD(s) failing to initialize after a hardware change.As mentioned those commands can't see anything but the NVME device. The other devices are recognized by the kernel, since lsblk can list them. To my limited knowledge; I think and am leaning towards the issue seeming to be volume mapping related...
-
UdoB reacted to JD-iteee's post in the thread [SOLVED] Making best use of multiple NICs per Node with Like.
Hi Maxim, with 4x 2.5GbE per node and your setup using Corosync, HA and ZFS replication without Ceph, I would separate the traffic types as much as possible to keep the cluster stable and easier to troubleshoot. I would use one dedicated NIC...