Latest activity
-
OOhmEye replied to the thread After PVE 8to9 upgrade, unable to check guest fs freeze status.Thanks for the reply! I admit I hadn't investigated the agent due to it working with no errors for years... root@redacted[~]# qemu-ga -V QEMU Guest Agent 5.0.1 root@redacted[~]# qemu-ga -D [general] daemon=false method=isa-serial...
-
cwt replied to the thread Hardwarer oder Software RAID.Die 5. HDD kannst Du als Reserve drin lassen und einen striped mirror aus den 4 Stück erstellen. RAIDZ/5/6 (parity) ist für VM Performance generell die schlechteste Wahl. -
Mmfederanko reacted to smileyz's post in the thread New 9.2 install - can't find 7.0.2-6-pve , not all the time with
Like.
What do your EFI partitions look like? If it works sporadically maybe you have duplicate IDs and/or one of EFI partitions didn't update correctly. Can you run: cat /etc/kernel/proxmox-boot-uuids lsblk -f |grep vfat -
GHallo geordi, leider gibt es keinen offiziellen Weg die Weboberfläche hier anzupassen. Du könntest CSS overrides über deinen Browser probieren, allerdings kann dies bei einem Update leicht kaputt gehen und andere unvorhersehbare Verhaltensweisen...
-
Rromek92 reacted to hardwareadictos's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
I can confirm similar behavior on a 4-node cluster running Proxmox VE 9.2.2. Cluster hardware: 2x Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 1x AMD EPYC 7551P 1x AMD EPYC 3251 Only the EPYC 3251 node is affected. Symptoms: Progressive performance degradation...
-
Hhardwareadictos replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.I can confirm similar behavior on a 4-node cluster running Proxmox VE 9.2.2. Cluster hardware: 2x Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 1x AMD EPYC 7551P 1x AMD EPYC 3251 Only the EPYC 3251 node is affected. Symptoms: Progressive performance degradation...
-
-
FFlocki replied to the thread [SOLVED] SDN Fabric issues since update 9.1.14.Hi, I can't recall the actual message that prompted me to reapply the SDN config. I can remember it was show under SDN/Status for all my VLANs/VNets, while the Fabric just was showing the usual "ok". Also there was no error message during the...
-
Moayad replied to the thread [SOLVED] Backup speed regression: 2h20m → 8h39m after PVE 8→9 / QEMU 9.2→10.1 / Ceph 18→19 upgrade.Hi, Thank you for sharing the soltuion. For your informaiton I set your thread as [SOLVED] to help other people who have the same issue. -
ggoller replied to the thread [SOLVED] SDN Fabric issues since update 9.1.14.Hi, I wasn't able to reproduce this on my cluster. A few questions from my side: How did this look in the UI? Did you get an error on apply? Where there any pending changes? We didn't deprecate anything in the fabrics yet AFAIK. You could try... -
Bbroth-itk replied to the thread "Bulk suspend", timeout, yellow traffic cone.I've seen only parallel suspends which run into timeout, I use those most of the time. Attached the log, interesting might be: May 23 23:26:31 pve pveproxy[1089089]: got inotify poll request in wrong process - disabling inotify ... May 23...
-
NNemesiz replied to the thread CEPH OSD(s) failing to initialize after a hardware change.Example: I unplugged wrong OSD disk, how to reactivate it? 1. Stop OSD process ( systemctl stop ceph-osd@XX ) and unmount OSD dir ( umount /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-XX ) 2. If OSD use encryption I need to close crypto mapper cryptsetup close...
-
Ee.fastermann replied to the thread Anpassung des Quarantäne Webfrontend.Hallo geordi, leider gibt es keinen offiziellen Weg die Weboberfläche hier anzupassen. Du könntest CSS overrides über deinen Browser probieren, allerdings kann dies bei einem Update leicht kaputt gehen und andere unvorhersehbare Verhaltensweisen...
-
Bbroth-itk replied to the thread "Bulk suspend", timeout, yellow traffic cone.I'll try to reproduce the issue on my own server. Aside from pveversion and VM config file, which commands shall I execute and which log files are required? I remember that the logs, accessible from GUI are very short when hibernation fails...
-
SSunilkumar replied to the thread Secure Boot Violation / Invalid Signature Detected after upgrading to Proxmox 9.2.Thanks Fabian. I think the important detail here is that the issue may not simply be “missing 2023 keys”, but specifically how some older HP firmware validates dual-signed EFI binaries. On this HP EliteDesk 800 G1 (BIOS L01 v02.78), the older...
-
like I said - this is a global problem the last few months (well, a bit longer now already I guess). anything with dynamic content that basically allows endless possibilities to query (like git forges, forums, ...) are hit particularly hard... -
SSunilkumar reacted to fabian's post in the thread Secure Boot Violation / Invalid Signature Detected after upgrading to Proxmox 9.2 with Like.
you should be able to enroll the keys using your bios, hopefully. alternatively, deploying your own PK via setup mode should also work, then you can sign all the key/cert updates you want yourself ;)
-
SSunilkumar reacted to fabian's post in the thread Secure Boot Violation / Invalid Signature Detected after upgrading to Proxmox 9.2 with Like.
yes, new shims are available now.
-
SSunilkumar reacted to Upstairs_Cycle384's post in the thread Secure Boot Violation / Invalid Signature Detected after upgrading to Proxmox 9.2 with Like.
Are the new shims already available? I asked about this recently: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/new-secure-boot-shim-on-proxmox-host.183404/ I did a full update on my proxmox host (now running 9.2.2) and I can see that the shims are still...
-
SSunilkumar reacted to Darkbotic's post in the thread Secure Boot Violation / Invalid Signature Detected after upgrading to Proxmox 9.2 with Like.
Thank you t.lamprecht Sadly, as janus57 mentioned, currently HP doesn't want to provide BIOS updates. I'm going to try the recommendation I got to see if I can update the Certs without a BIOS update.
-
SSunilkumar reacted to janus57's post in the thread Secure Boot Violation / Invalid Signature Detected after upgrading to Proxmox 9.2 with Like.
Hi, Not sure, they ditched old computers (produced in 2018 and before, see https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_13070353-13070429-16), and they will not provide any BIOS update (i know cause we have the issue with Windows instead of...
