Latest activity
-
aaron replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.As mentioned, there is no feature difference if you have a subscription applied or not. With a subscription you get access to the enterprise repositories, which provide the most stable packages, and depending on the level, a subscription can... -
fiona replied to the thread pve Node Note blank.Hi, from the docs: The notes are also saved in /etc/pve. Feel free to open a feature request to preserve the node's notes (after checking none exists yet): https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ -
Phello all i had quite a wired weekend behind me. nothing worked so far. so, i ask here about some more brain power and thoughts. we have 1 standalone server with proxmox installed, version 9.1.1 (could not updates yet, no internet on that...
-
Ffrankz replied to the thread Kernel error after pihole update.Hi Fabian, yes sorry but at the moment I have installed a new pihole as VM, so as soon as possible since lxc is still in production I will try to re-upgrade and see the error logs. Anyway I will do the test because this problem is important for...
-
driley replied to the thread No metrics shown on nodes summary page.If you really need to reset your rrdcached databases you can follow these manual steps: First stop the following services on each node in the cluster: systemctl stop pvestatd.service rrdcached.service rrdcached.socket The rrdcached databases... -
fiona replied to the thread Disk migration speed is capped by disk read/write limits in PVE 9.I'm still aware of the issue and it's on my TODO list, but so are many other things. But thank you for the ping, I'll see when I find the time for it now after the Proxmox VE 9.2 release.
-
fiona replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.Hi, with QEMU 10.2, there was a switch to using io_uring for the IO thread event loops and the IO pressure/wait accounting is set via the io_uring subsystem now. It's a different kernel subsystem from before, so it's not unexpected if it's...
-
Glike I said - this is a global problem the last few months (well, a bit longer now already I guess). anything with dynamic content that basically allows endless possibilities to query (like git forges, forums, ...) are hit particularly hard...
-
Glike many other sites and pieces of public infrastructure, ours is getting hammered by AI scrapers/bots as well. we try our best to implement counter measures, but it's a constant game of whack-a-mole.
-
Ggfngfn256 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.Sure. You can do anything on PVE without any subscription. You just can't get access to the subscription repo, which is a curated repo of the latest (already) available releases from the no-subscription & test repos.
-
Vvaschthestampede replied to the thread Unexpected backup failures.If I open discussions here in the forum it is because the company where I work, unfortunately, has no intention of purchasing support. I will continue to push for it but now I have to do without it. Anyway, with "where I can find other useful...
-
fiona replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.I'm waiting for a response from the maintainers.
-
KKrakish replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.Thank you for the fast answer. Living with free version last 2 years but it is time to be part of the community as well. Can I cluster 2 virtual PVEs and move VMs across without license ?
-
LnxBil reacted to MarkusKo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host with
Like.
With one community subscription you can only license one PVE with one socket, the physical host would be the best choice. For testing and playing around you don't need a subscription at all, just use the no-subscription repo. You will have to... -
KKrakish reacted to MarkusKo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host with Like.
With one community subscription you can only license one PVE with one socket, the physical host would be the best choice. For testing and playing around you don't need a subscription at all, just use the no-subscription repo. You will have to...
-
MMarkusKo replied to the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host.With one community subscription you can only license one PVE with one socket, the physical host would be the best choice. For testing and playing around you don't need a subscription at all, just use the no-subscription repo. You will have to...
-
fireon reacted to micneu's post in the thread ZFS zvol versehentlich gelöscht - Wiederherstellung möglich? with Like.
Ich denke, es ist am einfachsten und zugleich am sichersten, das Backup wiederherzustellen. -
KKrakish posted the thread [SOLVED] Licensing for nested PVE on single host in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi folks I got 2 questions I am planning on getting Ryzen 9 9900x 12 cores 24 threads with 128 gigs of memory for homelab physical host. Can I buy 1 community license and run on it proxmox home lab with couple of virtual PVEs and couple of VMs on...
-
Ssilverstone replied to the thread apt-cacher-ng and proxmox-offline-mirror-docs / proxmox-offline-mirror-helper.Thank you for your Reply. I've also had enough due to these 2 stupid Packages and decided to just mirror the entire pve-no-subscription and pbs-no-subscription Repositories. I am using a heavily patched Version of debmirror (Perl ... sigh...
-
BHow long will my Proxmox VE version be supported? Proxmox VE versions are supported at least as long as the corresponding Debian Version is oldstable. Proxmox VE uses a rolling release model and using the latest stable version is always...