Hi,
We are currently planning our new software test server. Our requirements are to run at least 10 -15 windows 10/11 Vms in parallel. they should all have an "acceptable" performance when working on them
our planned setup looks like this.
2x 14core intel xeon v4
128gb ddr4 ram
4x 1tb m.2 NVME SSD Zfs RAID 10.
Iops per SSD should be 400.000 to 500.000 according to manufacturer.
so in theory we should get between 800.000 to 1.000.000 iops on this zfs pool right?
How much do such numbers differ in reality and how many iops can you on average count in for single VM?
could this Layout work for at least 10 VMs or maybe even more. 15? 20?
Is ZFS RAID 10 even the best layout for this setup? as far as I know Raidz1 to Raidz3 only improves on Read and not Write performance (which is obviously pretty important with this amount of VMs)
How much does more RAM imact zfs performance. Does it make sense to get for example 192 Gb of RAM even though VMs only need 120 and the rest is for arc cache?
Thanks for your inputs
We are currently planning our new software test server. Our requirements are to run at least 10 -15 windows 10/11 Vms in parallel. they should all have an "acceptable" performance when working on them
our planned setup looks like this.
2x 14core intel xeon v4
128gb ddr4 ram
4x 1tb m.2 NVME SSD Zfs RAID 10.
Iops per SSD should be 400.000 to 500.000 according to manufacturer.
so in theory we should get between 800.000 to 1.000.000 iops on this zfs pool right?
How much do such numbers differ in reality and how many iops can you on average count in for single VM?
could this Layout work for at least 10 VMs or maybe even more. 15? 20?
Is ZFS RAID 10 even the best layout for this setup? as far as I know Raidz1 to Raidz3 only improves on Read and not Write performance (which is obviously pretty important with this amount of VMs)
How much does more RAM imact zfs performance. Does it make sense to get for example 192 Gb of RAM even though VMs only need 120 and the rest is for arc cache?
Thanks for your inputs