Proxmox VE 1.8 released!

martin

Proxmox Staff Member
Staff member
Apr 28, 2005
754
1,740
223
We just released Proxmox VE 1.8 - including a lot of fixes and updates - a big thanks to all beta testers.

This release includes the latest KVM 0.14 with a lot of performance improvements (2.6.32 and 2.6.35 Kernel branch) and also the latest stable OpenVZ (see 2.6.18 Kernel branch).

Release notes:
Roadmap

How to get the latest version:
Downloads
__________________
Best regards,
Martin Maurer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
....the Realease.txt in the root of the proxmox-ve_1.8-5754-4.iso is still that of pve-v1.7 ?!?
 
....the Realease.txt in the root of the proxmox-ve_1.8-5754-4.iso is still that of pve-v1.7 ?!?

yes - its just a bug. See the release notes from the wiki.

Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
 
Hi,

i had upgraded my cluster proxmox 1.8, all is runing fine but i had only one problem:

my vnc console is empty for all my linux vms. (no problem with windows).

what are the modification between 1.7 and 1.8 for the vnc console ?
 
Hi!

Just to be sure. Is the Kernel 2.6.32 shipped with release 1.8 include the patch to have NFS working with openvz?
 
yes, there were modification but already in the 1.7 releases. (minor updates). but we do not see any issues here - any details how to reproduce your issue?
 
we moved the kernel from pvetest, so I assume if the pvetest kernel works for you it will still work.
 
- i had the problem on all linux vm (debian lenny and debian squeeze , 32 or 64bit).

i was working fine with last stable 1.7 updates.

i'm using "fr" keyboard, i'had see some changes in changelog, but on "fr-ca" .
but i don' t have any display (black console), when the vm is booting or when it's running.

i'll try to search in the code.
 
After apt-get update + apt-get upgrade + reboot server stopped working

Booted via hetzner rescue system, seen such messages in log:

Code:
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: button: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: pcspkr: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: snd_page_alloc: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: wmi: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: button: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: i2c_core: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: soundcore: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: i2c_i801: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: snd: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: evdev: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: evdev: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: snd_timer: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: snd_pcm: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: snd_pcsp: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: pcspkr: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: Adding 10485752k swap on /dev/mapper/vg0-swap.  Priority:-1 extents:1 across:10485752k 
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: EXT3 FS on dm-0, internal journal
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: ext2: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: crc16: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: jbd2: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: ext4: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: crc16: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: jbd2: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: ext4: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: stp: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: bridge: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: stp: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: bridge: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: cpufreq_stats: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: cpufreq_powersave: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: cpufreq_conservative: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: cpufreq_userspace: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: speedstep_centrino: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: acpi_cpufreq: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:31 hz postfix/master[2208]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
Apr  1 03:15:31 hz kernel: x_tables: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:31 hz kernel: ip_tables: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:31 hz kernel: x_tables: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Apr  1 03:15:31 hz kernel: ipt_REJECT: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

Any ideas how to fix from chrooted enviroment?
 
Hi,

Same problem here.

It seems my NICS and Hard drive are not seen in the same order as before, which is problematic.

Had to reboot on a 2.6.32-3 kernel to have a working server.

M.


After apt-get update + apt-get upgrade + reboot server stopped working

Booted via hetzner rescue system, seen such messages in log:

Code:
Apr  1 03:15:30 hz kernel: button: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Any ideas how to fix from chrooted enviroment?
 
Why is that problematic (that is quite normal)?

Well, when sda2, on which is the /boot/ partition is now sdc2, that looks kind of aproblem to me when the os quits its ramdisk.

And with 3 NICs, two of which are 1Gb/s able and one only 100Mb/s, when eth0 becomes eth2, all the virtual machine lack a bit of bandwidth. If you see what I mean.
 
I haven't noticed, that mirror degraded, So, new kernel installed on sdb only. But machine booted from sda with old kernel. Then detected mirror and tryed to load latest modules from sdb. That faled because of different versions. Just unpleasant coincidence
 

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!