Propagation of pool permissions to member VMs?

[mathrock74]

Hi,

I'm using the feature of granting permissions for groups on VM pools for the first time. There's one thing I don't completely understand: should pool permissions be propagated to member VMs ("propagated" in the sense of: being visible in VMs permissions)? I'm very sure that in the case of one pool this propagation happened, then on the next it didn't, and then I couldn't reproduce it anymore. I see that permissions on pools work for VMs even when they are not visible in VMs permissions. I could just accept this now, but I also think it's a little confusing when you look at a VMs permissions, which are empty, but permissions are effectively in place. Maybe someone can explain how this SHOULD work.

thx
Matthias

 

[LnxBil]

Yes, the permissions tab is just for explictily granted permissions, not implicit ones. AFAIK, there is no way to see the actual given permissions as a list, just by looking at what you can do with the VM.