New Server build xfs or ext4

[spirit]

>>But I don't understand that about ceph rbd (what is RBD?)

RBD: rados block device

ceph support differents kind of access, rbd: block level (something like iscsi) cephfs: filesystem (something like nfs,cifs).

so rbd is the best for vm/ct storage, but you can also use cephfs to share some files like .iso, ....

 

[papete]

>>But I don't understand that about ceph rbd (what is RBD?)

RBD: rados block device

ceph support differents kind of access, rbd: block level (something like iscsi) cephfs: filesystem (something like nfs,cifs).

so rbd is the best for vm/ct storage, but you can also use cephfs to share some files like .iso, ....

Thank you.

 

[Gustavo Neves]

ext4 is slow. zfs is not for serious use (or is it in the kernel yet?). xfs is really nice and reliable. yes, even after serial crashing. ;-)

Sorry to revive this old thread, but I had to ask: Am I wrong to think that the main reason for ZFS never getting into the Linux Kernel is actually a license problem? AFAIK the original ZFS license was created exactly to block integration with Linux, right? Or am I wrong and things changed?