Hyper-converged 100Gbe MTU settings and best practices....

Hello,

We recently built a 3-node PVE hyper-converged cluster w/ ceph and I was wondering about the following:

  • For MTU size on interfaces, does it matter where that is applied? I believe I've found that on linux bridge it is unnecessary as it inherits it from the bond, but what about the physical interface? Currently config example is attached.
  • We're using MLAG across two switches - what should the hash policy be?
  • On our network switches - we're using FS - should the port-channels be set to a higher MTU than the individual ports?
  • What kind of speeds can we likely expect with a bonded 200Gb connection between nodes? Migrating VMs is pretty quick but I still see the speeds at around 2.2 Gb/s, so I'm just curious.
Just FYI, we're all L2, and are trunking all VLANs to the primary bond and bridge (bond 101 and vmbr0) - we tag the VMs themselves at the network adapter.

Appreciate anyone's input on the MTU and hashing policy.
 

Attachments

  • node03_exampleNetworkScrubbed.txt
    1.8 KB · Views: 5
  • Like
Reactions: pvps1

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!