Cheeky answer would be the lower latency / less congested one. If they are equivalent, it really doesn't matter. In fact the cluster syncing supports multiple at once even.
Cheeky answer would be the lower latency / less congested one. If they are equivalent, it really doesn't matter. In fact the cluster syncing supports multiple at once even.
I have used management ips for cluter creation, I am using HA ips for HA network. I was wondering what may happed if I use HA Ips in the cluster formation?
I have used management ips for cluter creation, I am using HA ips for HA network. I was wondering what may happed if I use HA Ips in the cluster formation?
It's your call really. If you are going to use the "HA" network for migrations/replication, then what could happen if it's easy to get saturated by the non-corosync traffic is your quorum getting lost and regained, which in HA scenario might end up having some nodes self-fence, so they would go on rebooting e.g. everytime something started migrating, which you do not really want.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.