i have one more idea.
what happens if you telnet to the smb port to the storagebox?
telnet u3XXXXX.your-storagebox.de 445
does it tells you then, that you can escape withctrl+]
or does it times out?
telnet u******.your-storagebox.de 445
Trying 78.46.14.173...
^C
Thats the issue, here it works, no matter if i try from home or from a hetzner server directly.I let it run for 1m30s and nothing happens.
It works on another machine though, but I must note that this other machine is on another network than Proxmox.
I'll see if I can get ahold of someone at home to try it on their own device, to single out if it's a network issue outside of Proxmox.
Code:telnet u******.your-storagebox.de 445 Trying 78.46.14.173... ^C
Thats the issue, here it works, no matter if i try from home or from a hetzner server directly.
Your outgoing port 445 is blocked somewhere, i think probably your home modem or something that has a firewall?
But that mystery is solved, you have just to find out what blocks your port.
Cheers
Hi!
You can use "sshfs" mount, just enable SSH access in your storagebox.
I would also recommend not to use cifs/smb over the internet but rely on SSH instead. You can SSH-mount the storage as well (sshfs).
@mainjj67 there is a good reason why the Fritz!Box is blocking that by default
I wouldn't use SMB over internet. It's not only insecure (even if there is the "seal" option), it's also slow and not reliable for non-local networks IMHO.
Well this is just a workaround/addon in my opinion to make a insecure protocol more secure. Still SMB wasn't designed to exchange data over the internet, there are better ways to do that. From my experience, even SMB over VPN doesn't really work very smoothly so I don't use it. But that's just my 2 cents, everyone can do this as needed of course.Why is the `seal` option insecure as well?
it is a good default to block cifs for home users.I just tried it on my dad's pc and it indeed can't connect either.
I then Googled "<my isp> blocks", and low and behold before I could finish my query the top result was "<my isp> blocks port 445"!
Thankfully we're changing ISP's soon!!
Agreed!it is a good default to block cifs for home users.
cifs is not meant to be a "remote" protocol