i’m glad that worked for you.
my hope is to find a reasonably performant and local path forward.
I don’t really want to run two different proxmox clusters, if I can avoid it.
I don’t really want to use a bespoke path likely to cause problems for FutureMe
…. I have enough of those as it is in other facets of my stacks; and I’d really prefer to keep my hypervisors using official sources…I don’t want to get stuck in a situation where the fork lags behind were something particularly problematic to arise
I’d prefer to find a way to have aarch64 emulation not suck on x86_64
as that would make things the “cleanest”barring that, having a way to add alt-arch VM trucks to an existing x64 cluster would be fine.
I can think of a few possible paths for this but I’d really love to hear what the pxm kids are thinking is the way of least pain enduringly, as I’m … moderately confident i’m not the only one desiring something along this vein….
i’d think that a full multi-arch cluster is likely to be painful… as performance characteristics of different arches would likely cause problems with core services trying to migrate from one arch to another feels like a den of papercuts
i’d think that a minimally functional ‘sub-cluster’ or altarch workload nodeset has viability… but i also dunno where dragons are hiding