I am new here so please forgive any forum faux pas and let me know so I don't keep doing it
Also, I am originally from a Windows Hyper-V background so please feel free to correct terminology mistakes.
I am setting Proxmox up on a single physical server with 3 raid arrays (it has a HW RAID controller Adaptec 8805).
The first is a mirrored RAID for the OS.
The 2nd is a mirrored SSD raid to host a SQL DB (will only have the virtual HDD for the QM that hosts the DB).
The 3rd is a RAID 10 array for virtual HDD for other QMs.
Since this is going to be a single node (no clustering, SAN etc), I think that putting the 2nd RAID on the local storage (adding it to the Node -> Disks as a directory) would be more performant than adding it as a shared storage (the datacenter -> Storage as a directory).
Is this assumption correct?
Thanks in advance.
Alvin
Also, I am originally from a Windows Hyper-V background so please feel free to correct terminology mistakes.
I am setting Proxmox up on a single physical server with 3 raid arrays (it has a HW RAID controller Adaptec 8805).
The first is a mirrored RAID for the OS.
The 2nd is a mirrored SSD raid to host a SQL DB (will only have the virtual HDD for the QM that hosts the DB).
The 3rd is a RAID 10 array for virtual HDD for other QMs.
Since this is going to be a single node (no clustering, SAN etc), I think that putting the 2nd RAID on the local storage (adding it to the Node -> Disks as a directory) would be more performant than adding it as a shared storage (the datacenter -> Storage as a directory).
Is this assumption correct?
Thanks in advance.
Alvin