100% Wearout on Kingston SSD

Your drives are probably fine. All vendors don't follow the same rules when it comes to publishing SMART values.
 
yep, this seems to be a false positive. seems like kingston uses 231 for the wearout indicator, we are only checking 177 and 233 at the moment (and kingston sets 177 to another wear indicator, which works in a completely different way ;)).

could you file a bug about this at https://buzgilla.proxmox.com (and include the output of "smartctl -H -A -f brief /dev/sda" and "smartctl -a -f brief /dev/sda")?