Search results

  1. A

    Proxmox VE 7.0 (beta) released!

    Im sorry, i was talking about he quotas on lxc container.
  2. A

    Proxmox VE 7.0 (beta) released!

    Is there any updates on this issue ?
  3. A

    Quotas issue with cgroup2

    Im in the same situation, but no response on this issue from anyone on the proxmox team
  4. A

    IPv6 Issues with LXC but not KVM

    Hi everyone, Im having a strange issue with lxc containers and ipv6. I set on every machine fe80::1 as ipv6 gateway. When using kvm, it comes up at boot it can ping externally any unicast ipv6 in the world, but when doing exactly the same in LXC, it takes time to start pinging (between 120 and...
  5. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    After filling a bug with debian systemd maintainers the response was this: Can you disable AppArmor confinement and try again? (with lxc 3.x that means setting lxc.apparmor.profile = unconfined) Or use the config options from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916644 Please...
  6. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    @t.lamprecht should i file a bug on debian on systemd package ?
  7. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    Yes, it's working, at least for now i can continue testing. Thank you.
  8. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    I'd try but that package (systemd_239) is no longer available in testing.... will have to wait for now.
  9. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    Yes. Earlier I though of systemd update as the main issue on this, but maybe there is a workaround, or just it is not possible? My apparmor knowledge is scarce to say the least.
  10. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    The Template is like this: Makefile: BASEDIR:=$(shell dab basedir) .DEFAULT_GOAL := all .PHONY: all all: info/init_ok global finalize finalize: echo "10.0 " > ${BASEDIR}/etc/debian_version dab finalize info/init_ok: dab.conf dab init touch $@ dab bootstrap --minimal...
  11. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    Hi oguz, Yes: arch: amd64 cores: 2 hostname: host10.mydomain.com memory: 2048 net0: name=eth0,bridge=vmbr0,gw=192.0.2.1,gw6=2001:db8::,hwaddr=0A:C6:94:AB:B3:7A,ip=192.0.2.10/24,ip6=2001:db8:ffff::3/56,tag=10,type=veth ostype: debian rootfs: local-lvm:vm-9002-disk-0,quota=1,size=30G swap: 0
  12. A

    Proxmox Container 4.3/4.4 and 5.2 problem setting up quota.

    I reported the bug to Debian and with the new version of quota package, solved these issues.
  13. A

    Debian buster LXC container

    Hi everyone, Just dropping a question i cant find around the forum. I managed to create an image using dab but since some days ago, im unable to install/start any service on the container. Im constantly getting apparmor errors like this one when installing mariadb: [510907.402767] audit...
  14. A

    Proxmox Container 4.3/4.4 and 5.2 problem setting up quota.

    This happens to me also with a image of debian buster. root@test-lxc ~ # quotacheck -cmug / quotacheck: error (1) while opening /dev/mapper/pve-vm--9002--disk--0 Downgrading to quota from debian stretch (Debian 9): root@test-lxc ~ # dpkg -i quota_4.03-2+deb9u1_amd64.deb dpkg: warning...
  15. A

    Updated to pvetest, PXE booting not working.

    Incredibly, i opened this bug almost 3 years ago, but today with latest pve no-suscription happens again :p but this time with proxmox 4.3 @dietmar any ideas ? Booting from Hard Disk... Boot failed: not a bootable disk Booting from ROM... iPXE (PCI 00:12.0) starting execution... pveversion...
  16. A

    Updated to pvetest, PXE booting not working.

    Nice, The fix is working, at least with VirtIO Network card configured. Nice job, a thanks a lot.
  17. A

    Updated to pvetest, PXE booting not working.

    Hi everyone, I updated one of my servers to pvetest (To test precisely) new package versions. Now i create VMs (KVM) but PXE no longer works. When the machine is turned on, i get the following: Booting from Hard Disk... Boot failed: not a bootable disk Booting from ROM... iPXE (PCI 00:12.0)...
  18. A

    Updated vzctl

    Ok. Im offering my help and time to upgrade the package and to make some changes to integrate new features. Its possible for them if they are clear and ok to accept them. I mean i dont want to work a lot on this to get it discarded.
  19. A

    Updated vzctl

    This was understood the first time. Is there a specific reason for this ? I mean is because it has specific set of patches ? or it breaks proxmox integration in someway ?, it doesnt compile on wheezy due to missing dependencies ? Also if its a need for time to merge it and test it, im offering...

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!