I used ZFS in the past for a while and it was a huge pita. I love the theory but in practice it performs poorly for intensive applications and causes a lot of headaches. On the flip side I have an hp server 4 x Raid 10 x NVME with mdadm/lvm/ext4 and had major corruptiion which completely...
There is a difference from a security perspective. You are giving each container on that interface access to all the vlans . I agree that your solution works but the limit of interfaces seems arbitrary and trivial to fix (if ur reading this support staff, I’m a paying user - 50 machines)
+1, I need to some times have 12 vlan interfaces on my containers and the way i do it now, i trunk on the Hypervisor and so I can only trunk 10 in total per container
I'm trying to get infoblox server to work on proxmox kvm.
The Infoblox setup calls for somethign like this:
<interface type='network'>
<rom bar='off' />
<source network='MGMT'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>...
Hi,
Currently my host has something like 40 interfaces, all configured to be on the proper vlan with no ip address.
My containers bridge these interfaces and have the proper IP address (no vlan configuration inside the lxc container)
The problem is that I can't "share" more than 10 interfaces...
I'm considering building out a cluster of promox machines between several datacenters. I read that latency is key for corosync.
I ran a little test and I got these results from machines that would be in approximately in the same locations as the cluster members.
Host is up (0.0039s latency)...
Hi,
Do you have any statistics on people with 3.4 setups vs 4.x setups?
The 3.4 setup is working fine and Debian is support wheezy for a few more years.
For "enterprise" type workloads especially ones where the major underlying tech is changing I feel like this is a really short lifecycle.
I...
Just to continue this discussion for intellectual purposes....
Whatever we think of LXC vs Docker - the fact of the matter is that the industry has chosen Docker for most workloads.
Secondly, kubernetes is the golden nugget but the space where we need a tool is to compete is with openshift...
I am using Proxmox 3.4 and considering waiting for Proxmox 5 rather than upgrading to Proxmox4.
I have a few questions
1. Will 4 to 5 upgrade be as "involved" as 3 to 4? If everything is being kept the same (no new cluster building, container conversion etc...) then maybe I might as well bite...
Kubernetes is absolutely without doubt the 500 pound gorilla in the virtualization space. However if proxmox wrapped kubernetes in it's interface it would be a huge boon both ways. I haven't seen anything with the level of cross-professional appeal of kubernetes.
What made ProxMox the best choice for virtualization historically was comparing containerization and full virtualization on the same platform. Now there is a new form of a virtualization
The value is having a single GUI/Management tool to control all your virtualization stack. Openstack is kind of doing this...
I really have to agree also with the last poster....
Right now we are in the midst of a revolution - docker is pretty much taking over and is the developers preferred...
It would be cool if proxmox was integrated with kubernetes (the defacto standard for docker orchestration)..... there is openshift too
Right now I am planning out how we are going to roll out docker in our enterprise.
It's going to go something like this
Phase 1 . Proxmox/KVM/Debian (or...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.