Search results

I think I need to be more clear. Software X: the gui calls Proxmox API creates the container the runs ansible against that new container. This software might also poll software Y to get the status. Software X is only used internally (our deployment tool) Y: our Java software which clients...

Hi, If proxmox has AGPL licensing and we create a gui that creates containers and then runs some ansible scripts then our service installed on the container talks back to that gui/interface. Does this cause a licensing problem? Do we have to give people the source code of our software or...

docker is the defacto standard in containerization, at my company there is strong push from developers to go to a docker based infrastructure.... at this point it inevitably leades me away from proxmox which I have been using for so many years. Please add native support for docker containers...

Ugly hack, anybody know about the memory reclaim situation?

Having this same issue" cat /etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf options zfs zfs_arc_max=8299967296 __ cat /proc/spl/kstat/zfs/arcstats |grep c_...

I just setup a "dream" zfs setup. I had 2x1TB SSD + 2x4TB HDD I have 2x800GB Raid 1 SSD- ZFS 2x10GB ZIL on SSD (raid 1) 2x100GB L2ARC on SSD (raid 0) 2x4TB bulk storage using L2ARC and ZIL from the SSD To do this - I actually installed proxmox which setup booting correctly with ZFS etc...

Re: how do you keep a single package up to date from repository not in your apt sourc There is a better way.... example: File: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/zabbix Contents: deb http://repo.zabbix.com/zabbix/2.4/debian wheezy main deb-src http://repo.zabbix.com/zabbix/2.4/debian wheezy main File...

sync=disable gave me 28000 sync/s I understand but the perf is like 10% of ext3

zfs pool data - wasn't familiar with that, - what is that? I thought ZIL should be on raid (as opposed to L2ARC)

On a bare-metal untuned zfs on raid 1 - 2 x ssd pm853T I get this FSYNCS/SECOND: 320.12 On a bare-metal I get this untuned zfs on raid 1 - 2 x ssd micron m500 FSYNCS/SECOND: 84.27 On a 3.35 install on mdadm raid 1 - ext3 - consumer ssd (mushkin deluxe x 2) FSYNCS/SECOND: 2845.59...

Hi, Setting up several new machines which have 2 x 1TB SSD 2 x 4TB HDD Theoretically I wanted to created SSD Drives 800GB SSD ZFS Raid 1 - pool0 - root mount 100GB SSD CACHE partition 100GB SSD ZIL HDD Drives 4TB ZFS Raid 1 - pool1 - secondary mount |____100GB SSD CACHE |____100GB SSD LOG...

Thanks, I will report back with how it works.

Thats what we are doing now for expeimentation but eventually I want bare-metal like performance so I would prefer openvz....

Considering this: https://openvz.org/Docker_inside_CT When will proxmox be using the openvz version necessary to support docker in VZs? We like what we see with docker and I am evaluating running dockers in Containers.

http://wiki.openvz.org/Physical_to_container

Clvm = cluster lvm = mountable in 2 locations at once. I am not sure why only nfs supports HA CTs

That wont work unless you have a shareable FS on top of the SAN otherwise you cant mount it in 2 places at once. I incorrectly always thought the NFS option was a hack and my personal view of NFS is sub-optimal performance ...

Probably using backup & restore... I havent checked though. I actually just copy over the .conf file and the disk image (while the machine is shut down)

Is there a supported solution to make the NFS server not a SPOF? And is the performance good?

I have been using proxmox for a few years now and I am wondering why there is still no supported HA solution for containers? At this point I an willing to code it myself....(i am a sysadmin though). This feature would literally phenomenal.... Is there some sort of theoretical limitation?