Search results

there are no artifical limits in pdm itself, so the only limit is what the system can give. mostly this is * network latency/throughput (e.g. for remotes with many vms updating the metrics, etc. can be quite large) * memory: from what i can remember a single resource with metrics (e.g. a...

while migration tasks should show on the pdm, i can confirm that the maintenance status of nodes is currently not shown on PDM Would you mind opening a feature request/bug on https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ ?

sadly that path alone does not really say where it comes from or anything else. can you see which device (e.g. pci id) id belongs to? what does it show? you can print it by doing, e.g. cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon1/temp1_input

yes, it should be the same as passing through any other gpu note that passing through integrated gpus is a bit more complicated usually, and not as well supported as passing through "proper" pci devices.

how does your remote config on the pdm look like? is it possible that the nodename <-> ip address mapping is wrong there? (that would explain it)

i guess sometimes the sensors that are available in linux via drivers/etc are not the same that are available via the ipmi so it might be a different sensor. do you know how beszel retrieves the sensor info? if the package 'lm-sensors' is installed, you could post the output of 'sensors' here...

well, sr-iov is the 'pci standard' way to do multiple vgpus on a single pci card. nvidia takes a slightly different approach (you have to "activate" a profile on the virtual function and need a specialized driver) for normal passthrough, nothing is changing here, so if you're not interested in...

nur um ein bisschen Klarheit zu schaffen (die Doku page kann man hier sicher noch verbessern!): grundsätzlich sind die angegebenen Versionen miteinander kompatibel weil explizit getestet, bzw. beim expliziten durchtesten von neuen NVIDIA Treiber Versionen kamen diese Versionen zum Einsatz...

i can't really speak to the performance of each card (maybe there is some relevant benchmark for you out there) but theoretically the b50 can do sr-iov (so "vGPU") while the a2000 can't do that. if that's relevant to you it might be an upgrade. we recently got some b50 here, but we have yet to...

ok so because i also ran into a similar issue with an RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell card. if the host has one region with X GiB + several others , the MMIO size must be the next multiple of 2 above X so in your case, the host reports: which would need a bar size of at least 1024G which you didn't...

Hi, you say increasing the mmio size did not do anything: how did you do increase the size? did you see the different solutions to increasing the mmio size here: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/PCI_Passthrough#%22BAR0_is_0M%22_error_or_Windows_Code_12_Error ? might be still worth a try, since...

well 'proper' vgpus with qemu will only ever be time-sliced and not directly the mig devices (because they're just 'virtual' hardware partitioning) i currently have access to an rtx pro 6000 blackwell card, which supports timesliced vgpus on top of mig instances, and that should simply work...

if you test it and it works, and you want it to be officially supported, it wouldn't hurt to tell nvidia that you want proxmox as supported platform :)

if you want to use 'vgpu' style gpu with a H200 you have to use nvidia ai enterprise https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/products/ai-enterprise/ which incurs an extra licensing fee to nvidia (idk the exact details currently, but in the past it was a certain amount of money per year per...

well you can give a pdm user privileges to specific things on the pve remotes so he'll only see (and can interact with) those. It does not give automatic privileges to the pve cluster itself, since the pdm user is not automatically logged in to pve

hi, please write your posts in english, otherwise it's hard for us to help you thanks!

hi, currently the users/privileges/groups/etc are completely separate between pve and pdm so if you want to manage the PVE roles you have to do it there, on PDM, there are separate users/privs for pdm, and itself has access with the user/token you gave when you set up the remotes i can see...

hi, sadly the error is not really telling what actually might be wrong. Are you sure pdm can resolve and reach that remote via the data you put in? (e.g. there is no firewall that's blocking access, the correct ip/hostname/port, etc.)

thanks, i'll start looking into it. can you also show the error when its expanded? do you know what steps were necessary to reproduce? EDIT: so from looking at it, the only way to trigger this IMHO is if your safari is older than 18.4 which is now ~9 months old. is this the case? if yes, i can...

@alex25677 can you post the output of pvesh get /cluster/resources on the pve node/cluster ? EDIT: disregard my question, i think @Eduardo Taboada here is right, you probably added the same remote 3 times, which counts the guest 3 times...