Search results

Mixing testing and production nodes is a really bad idea. Remember that a cluster's stability depends on it being able to find a stable quorum. If you do your testing with a subset of your nodes, they may interfere with the quorum of your cluster. Which is something you don't want in a...

Wie wird den dieses Zertifikat erstellt? Meines Wissens müsste der Fingerprint nur bei self-signed Zertifikaten eingetragen werden. Sonst kann das Feld auch einfach frei gelassen werden. Dann wird das Zertifikat einfach ganz normal via OpenSSL verifiziert. Sprich, wenn PVE irgendwie das...

Yes that is exactly my point. If you have four nodes that are properly subscribed, and you add one node that has no subscription, the entire cluster is considered as “no subscription”. So if you open a support ticket with such a cluster, your cluster will be treated as if it had no subscription...

Hi, if your clusters are new enough you could use the experimental remote migration feature [1]. The most stable and well tested approach is probably creating a backup and restoring it on the other cluster [2]. All you need for that is basically some storage that you can either transfer...

You could make use of Remote Migration, too, though that is still experimental [1] and may not be available on your older PVE host (tho, you should probably update that anyway). Alternatively, to move the disks, you can use zfs send/receive like so: Shut down the VM on the sending node and...

Dug into this a bit, looks like a POSIX compliance thing [1]. But if you are already alias-ing more, which is a standard command, I'd really recommend you alias it to less -F or maybe consider alias more="LESS_IS_MORE=1 less -F". This will only paginate when there is more than one screen of...

You probably want to start using less. The man page (man more) says: less -F will display a file like cat if it does not fill more than the entire terminal window. If it does, it will use pagination.

Ok, but this isn't comparable to actually having your PBS be destroyed, because in that case it obviously would have no knowledge of your media set or catalog for that matter. So I am not sure how comparable this really is. If I understand you correctly, you basically just want to re-import...

Alright, maybe there is a slight misunderstanding here. You don't need the media pool to be able to restore from tape, but rather a media set. At least that's my understanding at the moment. What do you see when you run proxmox-tape media content?

No problem, please mark this thread as solved by clicking "Edit Thread" above and selecting the "Solved" prefix if you don't have any further questions.

I think you mean November not September? At least I don't see a backup from September anywhere in your provided logs. Anyway, if you are wondering why the backup "vm/101/2023-11-29T09:25:41Z" was removed, the answer is simple: the 29.11. is in the same week as the 01.12. so from that week PBS...

Hi, have you run proxmox-tape catalog after putting a tape you want to restore into the drive? This will re-import your tape catalog and then you can restore your backups from there. Also see manual for more information [1]. [1]: https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs-2/tape-backup.html#restore-catalog

If you can, please post your solution and mark this thread as “Solved”, by clicking “Edit Thread” at the top and selecting the right prefix. This can help other users who run into this issue too.

How did you create the VM? Also can you post the full configuration of that VM? If you edit the ide0 entry and switch it to "Do not use any media", can you start the VM then?

The reason is fairly simple: ZFS is favored over BTRFS, because BTRFS is still considered a technology preview. BTRFS also still has a couple of showstopper issues, which is why we don't support it at the same level (see e.g., [1]). However, backups are a fundamental feature, and they need to...

Hast du die VM in Schritt 4 ge-rebootet (nach dem parted Befehl)? Die dritte Partition ist immer noch nur 9G groß: weshalb lvresize bzw. resize2fs keinen Effekt haben:

Well, hard to tell what is wrong here, since we don't know how exactly you patched the kernel and which version you used. Also, what does the VM's config look like? Can you please test it with the proxmox-kernel-6.2.16-19 kernel in the no subscription repo?

1. eigentlich sind wir nicht begeistert, wenn man alte Threads einfach so wiederbelebt, vor allem weil 2. das ein anderes Problem ist: Die Fehlermeldung sagt schon alles, es gibt auf der VM keine „pmg“ Volume Group. Wenn ich’s richtig sehe, handelt es sich hier nicht um eine PMG VM, sondern um...

Our “fix” is a back port of these patches [1] provided by Sean Christopherson on the KVM/Linux kernel mailing list. We don't have any say over what ultimately ends up in the kernel, but if these patches are accepted, then yes future mainline kernel releases will include them too. I'd recommend...

There isn't really a straight forward way to do that. From what I can tell this is a Windows 10 VM? I tried to look around what is currently the best way to find misaligned memory access from a user's perspective (not a developer's!). However, I haven't found much, especially not in cases where...