Search results

I'm having a bit of an issue here. It's not the typical hostname/hostname -f with the FQDN, etc. If I cat /etc/hostname, it shows me the name specified - host55 , but running hostname, hostname -f show pve01, pve01.domain.com respectively. pve01 is the host node name. The template I am using...

I have a 2 node proxmox cluster. I did a default install using a RAID10 with 4x500GB drives. I have a few machines on each of the nodes. I wanted to get a drdb setup for a mysql server that is currently running in a container. I've tried searching to see how this was possible and only found...

I was able to extract manually, and got similar errors. I found the 109.conf.destroyed file as well as the vps.conf file in the extracted tar. Can I simply move that file to the /etc/vz/conf directory, rename it and extract the tar to /var/lib/vz/private/109 and start the server? Thanks

Hi, I had to replace our proxmox box over the weekend and was able to restore 10/11 machines with vzrestore. Only one is generating the following error: host35:/usr/src# vzrestore vzdump-openvz-109-2011_10_07-03_29_41.tar 209 INFO: restore openvz backup...

I was trying to edit the backup properties, since only the master backed up last night. Even while logging in to the master directly, and attempting to enable the nfs target, it did not work. I bounced the box yet again, and this time it seems to have allowed the nfs target to be enabled...

Seems that our 2 node cluster went a bit out of the norm after upgrading both nodes. We did an apt-get update/upgrade/dist-upgrade last night, and the upgrade went through correctly. One box upgraded to 2.6.32-4-pve, while the other stayed at 2.6.24. The issue is that the box that stayed at...

Ok, I'm an idiot...forgot to turn the container(s) off... :(

I'm sort of stuck with a few of our containers. I've got a bridge vmbr0 setup on eth0, and have one container using it without any problems. I'm trying to convert a few of our containers to veth, so we can get some licensing that requires an eth0 interface. However, I'm sort of getting some...