Search results

Question is to @Miktash

May you be able to contribute your code to be embedded in the official distribution?

autolearn may still stay at no, although you trained bayes, because the level to be reached for autolearning keeps the same, either you learned the bayes database manual or not. For sure, that makes sense not to learn any messages, which are just possible spam, but also doesn't make sense on...

Hi, yes *2 means a score factor of two. In combination with the dnsbl threshold setting it can easier reach the necessary amount of points (at my setup 2) or in other words, a factor 2 list directly blocks the mail meanwhile a factor 1 list requires additional one to block. However, in later...

Thanks for response. Training is always somehow required but is also the only way beside blacklists and some settings to improve the filter over time.

And once again nothing new. All the lists above (still) produce too much false-positives to be useful.

rspamd is most based on fuzzy technique, which is much more mystery than AWL and Bayes together. ;-) That one didn't work for me at all. FCrDNS is also not working for me and is the same thing like @ittk posted above. You can be the preacher, which try to shame all the ones, which don't...

My five cents on that: I have AWL and Bayes enabled. Both works fine for me, however, Bayes isn't working for either installation with autolearn. My private installation for sure has much too less mails to ever reach the required volume of spams (ham is no problem). My commercial test...

Scrollout F1 is doing something similar like this. Would be great to have such thing similar in PMG, however, I would prefer not to add to blacklists, but to either learn as spam and/or (optionized) to have a "local blacklist" running, which takes such IP addresses and add them to a local...

May you be able to provide your adjustments for a) if you provide also your license/usage to Proxmox to be integrated with future releases and/or b) own implementations. I believe, Dr.Web is the only sense full alternative to Avast as others lack on affordable pricing, demonized mode or future...

Hmm, wieder eine Bestätigung, dass SPF unbrauchbar ist. An sich macht es ja Sinn, dass ausgehende Mails auch auf Spam geprüft werden, um sicherzustellen, selbst nicht Spams im großen Stil zu versenden (gerade bei ISPs bezüglich bspw. gehackter Konten oder Server, aber auch im Unternehmensumfeld...

You can't. There are SpamAssassin internal rules (you can find them via Google) which say at a minimum count of score in the header and a minimum count of score in the body the mail will be auto-learned as spam. That's exactly some users are asking for: 1. (I won't need BTW, as I don't use...

Response from Avast (translated in english via DeepL): Actually, it's just a renaming, the product is the same. There have been some changes in licensing and there are more repos that can be used based on the Linux distribution etc., but the functionality of Avast Core Security should be...

Thanks.

Please PN me on first point. 1. Look at my thread, postmarkapp offers such reports (for free with limited features or paid with more features). 2. I know of http://www.powerdns-gui.org which works a bit similar to InternetX AutoDNS, https://pdnsmanager.org I saw in many integrations at ISPs or...

That's all right, however, only conditionally greylisting makes sense for me at current times, so could be enabled or not, but SPF is no good condition as spammers are aware of that meanwhile blacklists take some time to list domains. So that's why I liked the rspamd approach, if still using...

I opened a support request. Hoped, you already have experience with that. ;-)

That's my question to the Proxmox team. I didn't test it out yet, as I still have a valid license for the old product, but once it needs to be renewed, I would ensure, that avast is still available to use just by settings avast to true.

@Stoiko Ivanov The links look nice, however, need to be integrated with your SpamAssassin adoption in PMG. Also I'm wondering (as I recently also thought about such an option), if that really works well, as the forwarded spam may contain also my header data from my system, where I forward the...

I currently run two installations: One with manually bayes learning and one with autolearn. The manually learning works fine and bayes scores help especially if mails are somehow between the spam scores. The autolearn does not work, as now more than two and a half year later not enough spam has...