Search results

no...I mean async or sync writes https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/sync-writes-or-why-is-my-esxi-nfs-so-slow-and-why-is-iscsi-faster.12506/#post-58450

do you even have a lot of sync writes ? otherwise a ssd zil won't help you at all

I'm using this - works good: http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/proxmox_kvm_module.html

it's on the list - at least lxc instances...but don't know yet when I've time for this...

what do you mean with 'boxes' ?

Introducing a Naemon/Icinga/Nagios plugin for Proxmox Virtual Environment Version: 0.1 Following checks are available: Cluster status SMART status of disks Available updates Dead/Stopped services Storage/Datastore usage CPU, Memory, IO Wait usage For updates, readme, etc... see -...

what value does the key 'status' gets when the subscription key is outdated/not valid/etc.. (over the due date) from /api2/json/nodes/{node}/subscription ? i guess it's somewhere at Subscription.pm...

thanks

I'm not able to find information about how long the token/ticket requested by api2/json/access/ticket is valid ?

so smartctl didn't report any errors ? did you update firmware of raid controller maybe there is a problem with the new kernel ? did you check virt io drivers ?

I can only share my experience from freenas/nexenta/zfs storage vmware/proxmox view if you want to go with freenas or any other zfs appliance you need to build knowledge of zfs without that you will fail sooner or later freenas/zfs has inbuilt replication with 5 servers I wouldn't go with...

I would rather do a smartctl on the disks then believing arcstats which would be new for me that it gets info from hw errors - but who knows only reboot so before >4.4 there were no problems at all and you didn't change any hardware or added additional vm's or whatever ?

I hope you do know that raidz is the worst choice for a vm datastore (random io). also scrub and resilvering will take forever it's good for space efficiency and sequential writes but read perf is abysmal 'cause you get the IOPS from the slowest drive in your vdev I don't know how much RAM you...

working with pve 5.0 out of the box I would like to add this information under https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Category:Hardware but I'm not able to find the information to get edit rights or login credentials for the wiki ?

ok installed pve 5.0 on the other host and it is now working out of the box with same configuration

ok so I tried a new server with pve 5.0 and with bridge_vlan_aware interface config + storage int iface enp9s0 inet manual auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 10.0.100.33 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.0.100.254 bridge_ports enp9s0 bridge_stp off...

I removed the storage vlan from the config so now I have only this auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual # SERVER auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 10.0.100.35 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.0.100.254 bridge_vlan_aware yes bridge_ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd...

ok so I changed the relevant part and changed the native vlan on the trunk to 100 (mgmt) so I can still access the pve host auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual # SERVER auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 10.0.100.35 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.0.100.254...

I've 2 phy interfaces - eth0 which is connected to a cisco cat configured as trunk - eth1 wich is a access port on the same switch for corosync communication # /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback # COROSYNC auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 10.0.12.3 netmask...

according to wiki entry https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Linux_Kernel 4.x uses the ubuntu lts kernel which is supported at the hcl of cisco for ucs 220m4 server. can I assume that proxmox uses the "base" kernel with some additional divers,settings,etc.. but not less ? maybe somebody can share their...