Search results

Thanks for the report! fixed that (and looked in the page for other mentions of pve this time)

Thanks again for the keen eye! - Should be fixed now!

could you please share the complete logs of the mail - usually there should be logs from pmg-smtp-filter present as well. without further information I would guess that something caused the mailprocessing to take too long and thus it was not done within the time out...

Thanks for the report! good catch - https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250806110251.2117322-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/T/#u (found that just a short bit before)

We tried to make those checks as safe as possible so this should not cause issues. A bit of background - currently systems: * having root on ZFS or BTRFS * booting using UEFI (not legacy bios boot) * not having secure-boot enabled use systemd-boot for booting `proxmox-boot-tool status` should...

Hm - we did quite a few fixes in that area - precisely due to the report you linked. Regarding recovery - I'd boot the 9.0 ISO in debug-mode, and get in the system from the second debug shell (let it boot into the first shell (which on some systems only produces garbled screen-output), hit...

yes - installing systemd-boot is needed to update the boot-loader copies on the ESPs.

Nicht so wirklich auf den ersten Blick - der notification body wird als top-level mime-part der mail verwendet - und wenn kein MIME-type angegeben ist wird text/plain angenommen (und da gibt es keine bilder) - außerdem ist der body auf 2048 Zeichen beschränkt - da gehen sich keine Bilder aus...

sieht nach einem partiellen Duplikat aus: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/automatische-e-mail-antwort-f%C3%BCr-e-mails-an-bestimmte-domain.168536/ aus - ich antworte dort kurz - und schliesse den thread hier um doppelte Arbeit zu vermeiden.

I moved your thread to the English subforum (it was in the German one). else regarding your question - please provide more details: * the logs of PMG for a problematic mail * maybe the mail itself else it's not possible to help with the issue.

This is not possible within the mail-filter as the mails are evaluated for To/From/When/What objects first (Spam checking (=spamassassin) is a what object) - and afterwards the actions are evaluated - see https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#_application_of_rules In general...

The straight-forward way would be to add a rule which blocks mails with a very high spam-score (that was the intention of the user-defined black/whitelists) - and I would not expect any legitimate mail to have a score > 20 - so adding a rule that blocks mails with a spamlevel of 50 should not...

could you please share the logs of such a mail and the mail itself (just to be sure where it actually originates from and how/if this can be adapted) - thanks!

please share the logs of such a mail and the relevant part of your rule system (`pmgdb dump --rules active`) This sounds odd as well - try with a fresh browser - and check for errors in the browser console I hope this helps!

The issue here is - once you run `zpool upgrade` on your pool you might not be able to import it with an older kernel (ZFS version) - OTOH if you don't need to use one of the new features (from a quick look fast_dedup and raidz_expansion) there's little gain to upgrading the pool IIRC.

Please share the logs of such a message, and it's rejection - this should help getting a clear picture of which part fails, and what needs to be adapted. in general changing addresses used by the mail-system is not a good idea.

wenn direkter Mailempfang so zeitkritisch ist - würde ich wirklich vorschlagen es per SMTP zustellen zu lassen - meiner Erfahrung nach führen polling intervalle von unter 5 Minuten eher zu überflüssiger Last auf den Servern und werden selten wirklich benötigt. Aber zur tatsächlichen Frage: die...

ich würde mir die logs gut anschauen - der `ss` screenshot oben sagt, dass unbound auf port 127.0.0.1 53 lauscht wenn in /etc/resolv.conf 127.0.0.1 steht, sollte er auch gefragt werden - unbound selbst muss dann natürlich die authoritativen DNS server im Internet fragen (sprich muss nach außen...

auf einen sehr schnellen Blick sehe ich bei der Blacklist regel (Prio 98), dass da auch ein To Object (Blacklist an) gesetzt ist - damit greift die Regel nur fuer addressen im From object _und an_ Adressen im Blacklist an object (da steht nur eine drinnen) kann das das Thema sein? Danke - als...

Wie genau sieht das Regelsystem aus? - ` pmgdb dump --rules active` liefert das als text (bitte auch als text in code-blocks posten)