Search results

In case anyone has the same issue, it's set in the VM >> Hardware >> BIOS (OVMF UEFI)

I'm not sure why this would cause an error. The original guide was updated to not include that typo a long time ago.

nm. apt dist-upgrade seems to be the correct way to manage this.

The following packages have been kept back: libpve-access-control libpve-common-perl libpve-guest-common-perl libpve-storage-perl lxc-pve proxmox-ve pve-container pve-manager pve-qemu-kvm qemu-server Hit:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease Hit:2...

Thanks for the tips. lol

Anyone else try to fire up the latest Ubuntu LTS release? I'm getting a QEMU kernel panic out of the gate. No Init found. Did service

Ahh thank you for clarifying that. Will change.

How is this any different than the guide?

Happy it worked for ya

search is your friend......

I think this has something to do with inter vlan traffic. It may have to go to the UDM-PRO from the 16XG >> 48P PoE which is on a 1gbit uplink. I think if I change the uplink to go from the UDM-PRO to the 16XG direct over the 10G link it should fix that.

I have 3 hosts that have a couple 10GBe interfaces on em. I am having an issue getting a VLAN on a KVM host to run at full 10GBe. It's running at 1GBe from my tests but only on VLAN 8. If I assign the VM IP to be the same subnet as the HOST IP subnet it gets full 10GBe. So I am not sure what I...

Cool yeah you’re right I forget about the loss of each drive with that many drives and sizes, it ends up being significant. thanks for the patch C

This is not a proxmox issue but will leave this here. I fired up a new VM on another host and tested that one in and out and it runs 10GBe. So will investigate further.

I have 3 hosts. All setup the same way. I can do iperf from host to host and get 10GB pretty consistently. [ 3] 0.0- 1.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.38 Gbits/sec [ 3] 1.0- 2.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.38 Gbits/sec [ 3] 2.0- 3.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.39 Gbits/sec But when I try to do it from a VM to a...

So this looks to include nfs mounts I guess, but the total still doesn't make sense. If it's going to factor in "everything", it should be closer to 200TB of storage. Also, even if i choose the HDD pool of the "hosts" that actually have the HDD disks, it's 20TB short for the total. 3 hosts @ 4...

no offense, but this still doesn’t make any sense. No where, anywhere in this system am I using anywhere close “25TB” of data. I know what’s on ALL my disks on ALL nodes and it’s about 500GB. it’s a bug... ....

Ok so i wiped out my main data volume and reset the values in the UI so nothing is selected and it shows like this: This makes no sense and is pretty annoying. Usage is accurate, Storage is making stuff up like our President.

Not quite that. I have Proxmox automatically creating KVM instances with cloning where all you have to do is run the join cluster components. This makes it easy to provision a group of KVM VMs to form a cluster across the nodes. If you want help doing this I can assist but you'll need some...

There isnt much overhead IMO with KVM and the benefits over what Proxmox could bake in wouldn't match the OS management or more true to form management of containers that the real OS world offers IMO.