Search results

you can use ISC DHCP Server https://idnetworks.net/how-to-install-configure-dhcp-server-on-debian-10/

hey, the debian setup is sometimes a bit strange... how did you configure the installer? you can setup a DHCP Server on your hostsystem... you can only use bridge mode on a hetzner server, if you are using single additional IPs with MAC-Addresses everything else need to be routed Setup. but...

Hey there, first of all I would suggest you to change the config of eno1 auto eno1 iface eno1 inet static address 135.181.142.136/32 gateway 135.181.142.129 pointopoint 135.181.142.129 iface eno1 inet6 static address 2a01:4f9:3a:1682::2/64 gateway fe80::1 if your...

Hey Matus, the difference is that Hetzner uses a Routed Network setup with MAC Binding for the IPs That mean you have to route your additional IPs via the Hosts IP. This Setup is a bit more complex but offers a lot of great features for You as a Customer and also for Hetzner examples are - HA...

we are doing it like this in our datacenter auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eno1 iface eno1 address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/30 auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 address 192.0.2.1/31 bridge-stp off bridge-fd 0 each host has a running bird instance and we have a script watching...

yes, lo is loopback please tell me some more details.. IP Configuration of all three hosts? How did you configure the routing? how are the vms configured?

have you tired to assign an additional ip to lo on alle three hosts and use this address as default gateway? example Host1 IP: 192.168.15.11 lo IP: 192.168.15.15 Host2 IP: 192.168.15.12 lo IP: 192.168.15.15 and than use the 192.168.15.15 as default gateway for your vms

you can use a qdevice for the quorum, disk size etc. doesn't matter https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Cluster_Manager#_corosync_external_vote_support are you shure, that you want to do a HA Cluster with that hardware? I suggest you to buy newer hardware (CPU, Mainboard and RAM)... Proxmox normally...

Hey, your Config seems to be ok, I would prefer to configure vlan17 untagged on the PVE port... have you tried watching the traffic vie tcpdump? you could watch vmbr0 to see if the packets are tagged correct.

erstens sollten sich wie @Moayad geschieben hat die IPs auf den Interfaces unterscheiden, zweitens muss das Forwarding für IPv6 ebenfalls aktiviert werden sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1

you should make sure that your server is in an own VLAN, that you don't disturb other customers...

and make sure, that ip_forward is enabled! that must result 1 cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

on your client it should look like this root@test:~# ip route default via 192.168.0.1 dev ens18 proto kernel onlink 192.168.0.1 dev ens18 proto kernel scope link src 1.2.3.4 and on your Proxmox Host root@host:~# ip route 192.168.0.0/31 dev vmbr4 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1...

well I think there was a mistake on my first post you should use iproute2 up ip route add 134.243.210.24/29 via 192.168.0.1 dev vmbr4 scope link

try it like this auto vmbr4 iface vmbr4 inet static address 192.168.0.1/31 bridge_stp off bridge_ports none bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 up ip route add 134.243.210.24/29 via 192.168.0.1 dev vmbr4 scope link

Hey There, I would do it a little bit different Host Config # Loopback device: auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface lo inet6 loopback # device: enp35s0 auto enp35s0 iface enp35s0 inet static # Single Host IPv4 address address 59.12.13.174/32 gateway 59.12.13.129 pointopoint...

Hey, nginxProxyManager is quite easy, maybe a bit more complex than the one in the synology, but nginxProxyManager supports SSL Certificates via LetsEncrypt...

Servus, mit der 6.0.X hatte ich auch ähnliche Probleme, weis nur leider nicht mehr welche Version genau, wurde dann durch ein Update behoben. Bei mir sind im Cluster unregelmäßig Hosts abgestürzt und neu gestartet, gab keine Hinweise im Log etc. ggf. mal ein Update fahren

Hey, you could use nginxProxyManager ( https://nginxproxymanager.com/ ) in theory you could run it on the host system but i would sugest you to set up a separate VM / CT

the problem is, that i have to check all clusters for existing tags when I want to create a new inter-communication vnet.. well yes its possible to do this, just wanted to ask... thanks spirit ps: the sdn feature is very great :)