Search results

Not sure how to help, got NFS working from my syno, ensure the IP you set in NFS access rights on syno is the correct one (might be NAT somewhere on your network for example...) I use fstab to mount it it works fine inside my VM : <ip-of-the-syno>:/volume1/shareA /mnt/syno/shareA nfs...

Hello, I'mtrying to passthrough a USB TPU (Google Coral) to my frigate LXC. Now the fun thing is that it sometimes it tends to change in which order it's being detected, so my config mounting /dev/bus/usb/002/002 to the lxc works fine untill for some reason the device becomes accessible under...

Hello, I'd like to track the usage of some VM disks, in terms of I/O, bandwith, maybe latency, and see over a few days or weeks what is actually being used by my VM in term of storage performance. I would like to know this for my homeassistant VM as well as my main docker host VM (running...

I'm thinking of buying a third machine to build myself a HA cluster of PVE. The main reason is to have high availability for my HomeAssistant VM. I'm running on gigabit Ethernet at max so I expect disk performance to be quite limited but I believe HomeAssistant will cope quite well with it. My...

Hello, I'm writing this to maybe get some more idea as to why I should invest time and maybe money in building a pve cluster or a shared storage pool. As of now, I have a setup that mainly does failover and which I quite like : 1 miniPC with 6*1GbLAN bonded in PVE for LAG, 32GBRAM, 500GBSSD...

Well, try patience, I rebooted the pve host then spent 4hours until I found pct fdisk to fix the corrupted filesystem of the container

Sorry to revive this ancient thread, but it seems @dietmar has some insights into my current issue as I just got a stuck container due to nfs backend being somehow crashed. Nonetheless, I was unable to solve the issue in any other way than ps aux | grep <cointainerID> and trying to kill...

Hello, I know it's probably nothing specific to proxmox but I'll try asking anyway : Every day from 4 to 5am there is something running on my system, making it hot, and I don't know what it is... I have seen the CPU temperature spiking for a hole hour in netdata, the nice PVE graphs show me it's...

To be totally complete, I was still missing a route , final fix looks like this : post-up ip rule add from 10.0.10.0/24 table 10Server prio 1 post-up ip route add default via 10.0.10.1 dev vmbr10 table 10Server post-up ip route add 10.0.10.0/24 dev vmbr10 table...

Thanks for the feedback yes ! The key in your answer for me is "if you can manage HA on an application layer, it will usually be better". I'll keep my investigations of proxmox clusters for another time and will first find a way to failover 2 traefik instances, then I'll come back to proxmox...

Hmm, sorry, looking at it it's not clear yes, but indeed I did solve it : the ip rule thing did work, no need for weight or anything else... The final solution : echo 200 myname >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables.d/myname.conf ip rule add from 10.0.10.0/24 table myname prio 1 ip route add default via...

Thanks for the reply and ideas ! In fact, only docker unprivileged containers will be exposed to WAN, but the docker engine that runs them will itself run in an unconfined LXC. I've been looking into mounting the cifs on pve host and later bind mountpoints on the CT. Leaving aside a few...

Hello, I use pve to virtualize my opnSense router, I'm about to install and configure a second machine with another pve and another virtual router that will use CARP to do failover of the first virtual router. I feel there is no need for me to use pve cluster features, especially since both...

Hello, I have found a way and I can now choose either a VM or a LXC to run my main docker host on top of pve. It will be the one exposed to the internet by my opnSense router, it will run portainer to let me start most of my services and try out new docker containers. The LXC looks better for...

Hello, ====== Edit: No I've actually found a simpler solution to my problem : route the trafic back from the interface it came from, I do this as follows : echo 200 myname >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables.d/myname.conf ip rule add from 10.0.10.0/24 table myname prio 1 ip route add default via...

Ok, got this working, I had 2 issues in fact : Getting the bond working with vlan-aware in proxmox create bond of all phy interfaces you need create vmbrX having this bond as slave attach the opnSense VM to vmbrX to access all VLANs attach VMs to vmbrX.Y with Y beeing the VLAN all traffic...

Hello, I'm getting desperate, I need help to find a setup where 2 windows clients can download files from my NAS using SMBv3 both at 1GB/s at the same time for a total 2GB/s sent from the NAS... I've tried a lot of things and got LAGG working between lots of parties achieving 2GB/s several...

Thanks spirit, that was indeed my understanding ;) I'm closing this thread since I spent hours trying out various setups, and I just fail to see why my opnsense virtualRouter is now able to send and recieve at 2GB/s to my NAS but not so when the traffic is actually beeing generated by 2 clients...

Hmm... This setup seems kinda dumb... In fact, I do have connectivity when using bond-mode balance-xor but regardless of the bond-xmit-hash-policy, It seems I cannot get over 1GB/s of bandwidth... I have tried layer2+3, even layer3+4, adn also layer2. I do the tests using iperf on my Synology...

Ok, it seems static LAG on my switch is actually bond type balance-xor. Tried it and for now it seems to work even with all interfaces plugges in which was not the case earlier... Will monitor and report...