weehooey-bh's latest activity
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 10G NIC HCL for Proxmox 9.0.3.@bravo0916 Not sure. What I can tell you is if you are going to find some information about capability, Ubuntu is the place you will find it. -
For supported hardware use the Ubuntu HCL, PVE9 uses Debian 13 Userspace but a modified Ubuntu 6.14 Kernel
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 10G NIC HCL for Proxmox 9.0.3.Hi @bravo0916 Sorry, I gave you an incomplete answer. PVE is based on Debian with a Ubuntu kernel. There isn’t a Debian HCL but there is some compatibility information available from Ubuntu. Others have asked similar questions...
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 10G NIC HCL for Proxmox 9.0.3.Proxmox does not publish hardware compatibility lists (HCL). Under the hood, Proxmox products are Debian. If the NIC will work with Debian, it will work with Proxmox products. We have found that Intel is a very reliable network interface card...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 0.9 Beta released! with
Like.
After months of hard work and collaboration with our community, we are thrilled to release the beta version of Proxmox Datacenter Manager. This version is based on the great Debian 13 "Trixie" and comes with a 6.14.11 Kernel as stable default and... -
weehooey-bh reacted to HomeSecExplorer's post in the thread Proxmox server hardening document for compliance with Like.
Hi y’all, I’ve released a Proxmox hardening guide (PVE 8 / PBS 3) that extends the CIS Debian 12 benchmark with Proxmox specific tasks. Repo: https://github.com/HomeSecExplorer/Proxmox-Hardening-Guide A few controls are not yet validated and are...
-
Mostly iirc, but I haven't revisited the patch series in a while so i'd have to re-check tbh. I think it would be good to fix the issues before we can apply the patch series. We're currently working on overhauling the whole stack with the help...
-
Hi @whiney , welcome to the forum. At this point in time you are using the primary supported option. Today, your only option to have all of the above is to use a 3rd party cluster-aware filesystem, i.e. OCFS. I'd recommend researching its...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to LnxBil's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
Yes, we don't talk about the same thing. It's not ONLY the filesystem, it's also the backend storage (where there is no filesystem) and that's what I'm talking about. Unless you have a SHARED write cache, as good enterprise SAN storage solutions...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
Thats an interesting take. For someone who derides others for being fanboys, that statement shows an astounding lack of self awareness. ceph is a scaleout filesystem with multiple api ingress points. zfs is a traditional filesystem and not...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to guruevi's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
The entire chassis is not redundant, the backplane electrically is likely going to be redundant, if you use SAS drives, you can reach the disk from ‘two channels’. Backplanes are not passive components, they have controllers, depending on model...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to spirit's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
I can speak about my solaris 2 nodes zfs that died 15year ago, with 3 days of downtime because of zil crash on 2 disk at the same time if you want ;) Never had a single downtime with ceph since 2015. what about rollback on 2 previous snapshot...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to shanreich's post in the thread [IPSET ipfilter-net0] - not working unless I add vm specific firewall rule to only allow traffic from the IPSET with Like.
I haven't gotten around to further looking into this due to the release stress, but I intend to work on proxmox-firewall related issues / fixes in the coming weeks. Please note that the nftables firewall is still in tech preview and not...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to tuxis's post in the thread Dutch Proxmox Day 2025 - Free Proxmox Community Event with Like.
Hi Steven, No recordings will be made of the presentations. We will ask the companies involved if we can share the presentations afterwards. On a side note: it might be worth registering for the waiting list. From our experience there are...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to spirit's post in the thread Dutch Proxmox Day 2025 - Free Proxmox Community Event with Like.
@tuxis Are you looking for speakers ? Maybe I could make a talk on my current work on SAN snapshot support. (I have already done a conference in French, slides are almost ready, I just need to translate them to English)
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread Notification after VM Restore.Right now, restores are not included in the built-in notifications. As a starting point, you could monitor journalctl for restore entries and act upon that event (i.e. send an email). /usr/bin/journalctl -f -n 0 | /usr/bin/grep --line-buffered...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to hevisko's post in the thread "Show Guest Without Backup Job" is dangerous! with Like.
As everything Unix/ProxMox - they provide you the rope, the question is whether you'll tie it around your neck or your waist as you jump off the building... I actually abuse the above from OP to hide the Guests I don't want to backup :D I'm...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to toto-ets's post in the thread 3 NICS 2 bonded with 802.3ad plus failover to second switch? with Like.
OK thank you.
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 3 NICS 2 bonded with 802.3ad plus failover to second switch?.Carefully read and follow: Corosync Redundancy
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 3 NICS 2 bonded with 802.3ad plus failover to second switch?.Yes, you can configure up to eight (8) separate Corosync links. Just make the primary link (link 0) entirely separate from all other traffic.