weehooey-bh's latest activity
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread Dual 10GB, weird behaviour.Some suggestions: You can use bmon on your PVE host to determine which interface is handling the traffic. When you run iperf3, use port numbers other than the default. Disconnect one of the links and test again. Do you get the speeds you are... -
weehooey-bh replied to the thread Persistent VNC Port Conflict Issue During VM Migration in Proxmox Cluster.Do you mean mapping VMID to the VNC port number somehow? Or is there another method?
-
weehooey-bh reacted to fiona's post in the thread Migrating with Conntrack doesn't work after Updating to 9.0.5 with
Like.
Initial patches to fix the new issue and bug #7092 were proposed now: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20251217131724.118681-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com/ -
weehooey-bh reacted to Petr Svacina's post in the thread [SOLVED] How to "isolate" PBS from PVE - security best practices ... with Like.
Ach good idea, thanks for the ultra quick reply ! :) Mery Christmas !
-
weehooey-bh reacted to fabian's post in the thread [SOLVED] How to "isolate" PBS from PVE - security best practices ... with Like.
you can give the PVE access token only access to read old backups and create new ones, but not remove/prune backups. you can combine this with a sync job on the PBS side to keep an offsite archive that is decoupled from the main PBS system (with...
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread Persistent VNC Port Conflict Issue During VM Migration in Proxmox Cluster.@bytegenius You can file a feature request here: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ Once you do that, please post the link back here so people can follow it. @lost_avocado where did you see this? Can you post a link to it? How do you get the port...
-
We're playing around with it since the first release candidates in QA and think that we will be able to provide a public build on the test repo in the comming weeks. When we actually provide full (enterprise) support depends a bit on QA and how...
-
there will be an announcement once packages are available for testing ;)
-
weehooey-bh reacted to LnxBil's post in the thread Spinning disks reporting as type "unknown" with Like.
An SSD reports itself as SSD, a HDD does NOT report itself as HDD, because there was nothing else than HDD for many decades. Do you experience problems with this report? It makes no practical difference in running the computer.
-
weehooey-bh reacted to fabian's post in the thread Proxmox cloning corrupts the target image - extensive analysis included with Like.
cloning the disk does not care about its contents at all.. is this a physical disk? or iSCSI? or ? please provide more data! could you also post "lvmconfig --typeconfig full | grep -e thin -e zero" and "pveversion -v", thanks!
-
What is the problem with Austria, did I miss something?
-
weehooey-bh reacted to fabian's post in the thread What Permissions are needed on the PVE/PBS-Remotes for a Datacenter Manager User? with Like.
that would just be more complicated, but still require PDM to have all that access to PVE.. it would also make certain optimizations impossible, like collecting metrics/tasks/status/.. once and exposing it to different PDM users (with filtering).
-
weehooey-bh reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.0 (stable) with Like.
You certainly don't, contact our shop team or the partner you bought the subscriptions with, they are happy to help on the upgrade to our second-lowest (!), or higher, subscription tier. Having the majority of server non-prod is certainly not a...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.0 (stable) with Like.
That makes zero sense. The PVE Community subscription is for the PVE enterprise repo, not for the PDM one, just like it is not for the PBS one. So absolutely nothing changed for existing PVE installations, besides you now being able to now also...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.0 (stable) with Like.
No, we do not provide any such scripts for PVE either and strongly recommend against installing any third party software, especially without carefully vetting it. See the FAQ for how to get rid of these notices the legitimate way...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.0 (stable) with Like.
All the most recent installers of all our projects released this quarter include network interface pinning settings and pin by default to nicX. You can simply untick the "Pin network interface names" chechbox in the network step, or edit the...
-
Same here: Now saw that you cross-posted this in various threads, see my reply here and please stop doing such spam-like mass replies. https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-datacenter-manager-1-0-stable.177321/page-3#post-825776
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread pocket drop.Re-review your configuration. Please post your /etc/network/interfaces file. Confirm that the packets are flowing as you expect them to. A packet capture may provide some insights. What is your definition of "moderate" traffic? Is this the...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to VictorSTS's post in the thread CEPH Erasure Coded Configuration: Review/Confirmation with Like.
Each K and M must be in a different host because you want your fault domain to be host (the default), not disk: i.e. if fault domain was disk you may end up with too many K or M (or both!) for some PGs in the same host and if that host goes down...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to shanreich's post in the thread Bonded ethernet uplinks broken in pve-common 9.1.1 with Like.
submitted an initial patch, thanks for the report: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20251216094329.36089-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com/T/#u