weehooey-bh's latest activity
-
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 10G NIC HCL for Proxmox 9.0.3.Hi @bravo0916 Sorry, I gave you an incomplete answer. PVE is based on Debian with a Ubuntu kernel. There isn’t a Debian HCL but there is some compatibility information available from Ubuntu. Others have asked similar questions... -
weehooey-bh replied to the thread 10G NIC HCL for Proxmox 9.0.3.Proxmox does not publish hardware compatibility lists (HCL). Under the hood, Proxmox products are Debian. If the NIC will work with Debian, it will work with Proxmox products. We have found that Intel is a very reliable network interface card...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 0.9 Beta released! with
Like.
After months of hard work and collaboration with our community, we are thrilled to release the beta version of Proxmox Datacenter Manager. This version is based on the great Debian 13 "Trixie" and comes with a 6.14.11 Kernel as stable default and... -
weehooey-bh reacted to HomeSecExplorer's post in the thread Proxmox server hardening document for compliance with Like.
Hi y’all, I’ve released a Proxmox hardening guide (PVE 8 / PBS 3) that extends the CIS Debian 12 benchmark with Proxmox specific tasks. Repo: https://github.com/HomeSecExplorer/Proxmox-Hardening-Guide A few controls are not yet validated and are...
-
Mostly iirc, but I haven't revisited the patch series in a while so i'd have to re-check tbh. I think it would be good to fix the issues before we can apply the patch series. We're currently working on overhauling the whole stack with the help...
-
Hi @whiney , welcome to the forum. At this point in time you are using the primary supported option. Today, your only option to have all of the above is to use a 3rd party cluster-aware filesystem, i.e. OCFS. I'd recommend researching its...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to LnxBil's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
Yes, we don't talk about the same thing. It's not ONLY the filesystem, it's also the backend storage (where there is no filesystem) and that's what I'm talking about. Unless you have a SHARED write cache, as good enterprise SAN storage solutions...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
Thats an interesting take. For someone who derides others for being fanboys, that statement shows an astounding lack of self awareness. ceph is a scaleout filesystem with multiple api ingress points. zfs is a traditional filesystem and not...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to guruevi's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
The entire chassis is not redundant, the backplane electrically is likely going to be redundant, if you use SAS drives, you can reach the disk from ‘two channels’. Backplanes are not passive components, they have controllers, depending on model...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to spirit's post in the thread !! Voting for feature request for zfs-over-iscsi Storage !! with Like.
I can speak about my solaris 2 nodes zfs that died 15year ago, with 3 days of downtime because of zil crash on 2 disk at the same time if you want ;) Never had a single downtime with ceph since 2015. what about rollback on 2 previous snapshot...
-
weehooey-bh reacted to shanreich's post in the thread [IPSET ipfilter-net0] - not working unless I add vm specific firewall rule to only allow traffic from the IPSET with Like.
I haven't gotten around to further looking into this due to the release stress, but I intend to work on proxmox-firewall related issues / fixes in the coming weeks. Please note that the nftables firewall is still in tech preview and not...