Recent content by UdoB

Ja, klar. Da sind wir uns (mal wieder) einig :-) Allerdings hängt "sinnvoll" sehr stark von der jeweiligen Situation ab. In meinem Fall hatte ich mich ja nach durchaus erfolgreichem Test dagegen entschieden...

PVE ist Debian --> es geht praktisch alles, was mit Debian geht :-) Ich hatte mal versucht, mir eine "bessere Workstation" zu bauen: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-9-1-1-developer-workstation-shared-folder-clipboard.183675/post-853509

Yeah! One should clean up the (software-) stack from top to bottom...

Well, I can not write a dedicated complete guide for that setup. My answers are always only snippets of the whole picture. (And: I do not use pfSense...) If #4 is still valid: yes. But in #7 you show that vmbr1 exists with enp5s0. Does that interface exist? #4 and #7 contain different...

Wiping is in the GUI too - no need for CLI. (<node> --> Disks --> select the device --> Wipe Disk)

Right. From pfSense's point of view. Basically "WAN" + "LAN" are just names. Plus some default rules created already for you - allow output through WAN w/ or w/o NAT, deny input at WAN. Also enable routing inside pfSense. If you label the current WAN DMZ instead then the final picture may make...

It is a different network --> reachable only with an active router and your working PC using that route. My answer does not directly solve your problem, sorry. Just use the other IP (.0.59) for setup, that does work, right? I recommend to draw a network diagram with networks, NICs and...

Richtig! Dazu kommt noch: viele lesen "Container" und denken "Docker!". Wenn ich mit auf einem kleinen Rechner damit arbeiten will, ist PVE definitiv Overkill. Dazu genügt ein schlichtes Trixie und das mitgebrachte "Docker". (Oder notfalls das aktuellere...

Ich bin definitiv ein Proxmox PVE Fan. Aber damit: würde ich eher OMV (oder ähnliches) direkt installieren. PVE bringt notgedrungen Overhead...

You can run zpool upgrade without(!!) a poolname to get a list of new feature flags. Then look them up in man zpool-features if there is something interesting you really want to use. Then run "zpool upgrade HP-BACKUP". If you don't "upgrade" then the new features are not available. But there is...

That one was always overhyped. Today ZFS works with a very few GB of Ram, capped at 16 GiB on a PVE installation: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/ZFS_on_Linux#sysadmin_zfs_limit_memory_usage This one is true. And @LnxBil hit the nail: " Not using ZFS will remove some important features from your...

Two years ago I tried to use Ceph in my homelab. My experience: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabu-can-i-use-ceph-in-a-_very_-small-cluster.159671/ I am not a Ceph user now. But I would not start with fewer than five active nodes. Just my irrelevant two €¢...

"gb" is not defined in this context. Probably (read: definitely) you have GiB --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibibyte#Multiple-byte_units Scnr... As usual: "it depends". This would just be my personal choice: I would install (only) on the two SSD, mirrored ZFS. If these are cheap SSDs...

...and possibly vice versa on the other end.

Mich interessiert heutzutage insbesondere die Leistungsaufnahme. Hast du mal gemessen?