Recent content by Terminatrix

I have done the following now to import it zpool import -f zfs But now the usage is not showing correctly df -h zfs 5.5T 128K 5.5T 1% /zfs zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zfs...

My hard drive with Proxmox installed on it failed and I have had to replace it with a fresh installation however my ZFS pool was on another drive My ZFS pools data was configured on /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1 How am I able to mount this again on the new installation of Proxmox without losing...

I see. I disabled hyperthreading by doing the following echo off >/sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control # check if succeeded cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control The virtual machines running now have more CPU steal but the main problem is sort of resolved. The memory and hard disks...

This has helped. AMD EPYC 7642 is not a good CPU to have HT enabled on? I need to do some reading up on this but so far all I came across is that AMD cores are noted at "real cores" whatever that means.

Sorry for the delay the usage went down, now the problem is back. cat /proc/pressure/cpu some avg10=13.60 avg60=21.69 avg300=18.65 total=559600398658 cat /proc/pressure/io some avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=23012146775 full avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=10762526872 cat...

How would I check that?

My nodes CPU is CPU(s) 96 x AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor (1 Socket) The load average has been at 150+ now for several hours but the CPU usage doesn't go above 70%. ps faxl | grep " D " 1 0 3789 2 20 0 0 0 taskq_ D ? 1164:49 \_ [txg_sync] 0 0 47979 3975...

What is the difference between the two following set ups? I have not noticed any performance differences inside the virtual machine. Are there any pros/cons between the two?

The problem I am facing with OVH vRACK IP blocks and Generic Cloud images is each IP block has it's own gateway IP and may have a different netmask (depending on block sizes). Example block 51.xx8.1xx.64/28 Network IP : 51.xx8.1xx.64 Gateway IP : 51.xx8.1xx.78 (not...

How am I able to modify this setting via CLI?

They enable host flag and they use the same hardware too as far as I can see (different countries use different hardware but each region seems to be the same).

Yes it's nice :) now I need to just work on getting cloud-init to work live migration haha Can you think of any other reasons? I can only think that maybe they don't want users to sell virtual machines as those users would use more total resources.

Yes https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-6-3-qemu-5-1-nested-live-migration-on-intel-cpu.79698/

I have done that though. There was no errors shown, both had the same CPU. I think it does work if you have host as CPU type?

I know that some big hosting providers like Contabo which uses Proxmox disabled nesting inside their normal VPS packages. Why would you say they do this? What are the disadvantages if for example I am using 6 cores/1 socket.